Tag: peak credit theory
Earlier cash withdrawal can be explained as source for subsequent bank deposit of cash, provided there are no evidence to show that those withdrawals could not be available to as a source for subsequent deposits. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3471 (2021) (03) ITAT In the instant case, the …
When cash deposit was fully explained no peak credit addition was required as directed by ITAT while remitting the matter back to Assessing Officer ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3210 (2019) (12) ITAT The single issue involved in the instant case was confirmation by the CIT(A)of the addition made …
Peak credit addition does not include income after peak balance date. ITAT directed addition of further 8% profit after the date of peak value ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2949 (2019) (05) ITAT The assessee was a partner in a firm. On the basis of the Annual Information …
Merely cash withdrawals at one point of time cannot be a sole basis for explaining the cash deposit in future. ITAT upheld additions u/s 69. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2681 (2018) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: The instant appeal had been filed by the assessee against …
Peak of both debit and credit entries of seized papers only can be added as undisclosed income, no justification for adding only receipt side of seized papers ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2651 (2018) (11) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Tirupati Construction Company 55 taxmann.com 308 (2015 …
Peak credit theory not applicable if deposits are unexplained u/s 68. High Court overruled ITAT decision where CA was providing accomodation entries and could not explain the deposits in his bank account. The Court held that where assessee is unable to explain the sources of deposits and the corresponding …
Additions ignoring peak credit amounts to double taxation if there is no material to show cash withdrawals could not have been re-deposited-ITATÂ ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1082 (2016) (12) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case: The Assessing Officer (AO) found that the assessee had not disclosed one …
Peak Credit theory additions apply for unexplained cash deposits or where assessee fails to give satisfactory explanation and amount is sought to be added u/s 68 69-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1081 (2016) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws cited: CIT vs. K. Chinnatharmban (292 ITR 682)(SC) Manoj …
Peak Credit theory additions ordered despite details not provided, evidence not furnished for the purposes of withdrawals from bank account-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1080 (2016) (12) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case: The return of income of the assessee was selected for scrutiny under the CASS …
Peak credit theory do not apply to cash deposits made at outstation stations/cities when cash withdrawal were made at one city only – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 962 2016 (06) ITAT Assessment Year: 2009-10 Date/Month of Judgment/Order: June 2016 Brief Facts of the Case: The case of …
