Tag: penalty 271b
AO can not question genuineness of medical certificate unless he has some material to counter it – ITAT deletes penalty u/s 271B ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3722 (2023) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Balaji Logistics vs. ACIT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order …
Delay in filing of Tax Audit Report due to computer data crash- Penalty u/s 271B quashed ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3673 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre in confirming income tax penalty u/s 271B …
Penalty u/s 271B deleted. Books of Accounts not finalised due to TDS credit mismatch despite assessee made sincere attempts for its rectification and resignation of accountant ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3246 (2020) (02) ITAT The assessee had filed an appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax …
No Penalty u/s 271B where assessee under bona-fide belief failed to get accounts audited u/s 44AB despite turnover exceeding threshold for sale/purchase of shares ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3216 (2020) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal had been filed at the instance of the Assessee against …
Penalty 271B deleted as accountant had to look after business activities due to assessee neurological problem. Hence he failed to coordinate with Auditor’s office ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3207 (2019) (12) ITAT In the instant case the appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the …
No tax audit in one proprietorship firm-ITAT deleted penalty u/s 271B as when no accounts was maintained, assessee was not be expected to get them audited. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3166 (2019) (10) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Shri Rajeshbhai Hirabhai Patel Vs. ITOShri Udayshankar …
Penalty u/s 271B deleted for frequent change of Managing Director resulting delay in statutory audit causing delay in audit u/s 44AB within stipulated period. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2967 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd. vs. …
If books of account not maintained penalty u/s 271B cannot be levied for non audit u/s 44AB. ITAT deleted penalty u/s 271B and sustained penalty u/s 271A ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2935 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT Vs. S.K. Gupta …
High Court declines to entertain Writ Petition against income tax penalty order in view of alternative remedy available by way of appellate provisions ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2406 (2018) 07 HC The petitioner assessee had not submitted his return of income an audit reports for the relevant …
Penalty 271B treating cash deposits in bank as turnover u/s 44AB upheld by Tribunal when assessee could not explain source of deposit in bank accounts The instant appeals were filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A) confirming the penalty levied under section 271B of the …
