Tag: penalty 271b
Penalty u/s 271B deleted as assessee was not aware that section 44AB related to Tax Audit was applicable to him as he was only a commission agent ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3757 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the …
AO can not question genuineness of medical certificate unless he has some material to counter it – ITAT deletes penalty u/s 271B ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3722 (2023) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Balaji Logistics vs. ACIT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order …
Delay in filing of Tax Audit Report due to computer data crash- Penalty u/s 271B quashed ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3673 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre in confirming income tax penalty u/s 271B …
Penalty u/s 271B deleted. Books of Accounts not finalised due to TDS credit mismatch despite assessee made sincere attempts for its rectification and resignation of accountant ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3246 (2020) (02) ITAT The assessee had filed an appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax …
No Penalty u/s 271B where assessee under bona-fide belief failed to get accounts audited u/s 44AB despite turnover exceeding threshold for sale/purchase of shares ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3216 (2020) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal had been filed at the instance of the Assessee against …
Penalty 271B deleted as accountant had to look after business activities due to assessee neurological problem. Hence he failed to coordinate with Auditor’s office ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3207 (2019) (12) ITAT In the instant case the appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the …
No tax audit in one proprietorship firm-ITAT deleted penalty u/s 271B as when no accounts was maintained, assessee was not be expected to get them audited. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3166 (2019) (10) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Shri Rajeshbhai Hirabhai Patel Vs. ITOShri Udayshankar …
Penalty u/s 271B deleted for frequent change of Managing Director resulting delay in statutory audit causing delay in audit u/s 44AB within stipulated period. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2967 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd. vs. …
If books of account not maintained penalty u/s 271B cannot be levied for non audit u/s 44AB. ITAT deleted penalty u/s 271B and sustained penalty u/s 271A ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2935 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT Vs. S.K. Gupta …
High Court declines to entertain Writ Petition against income tax penalty order in view of alternative remedy available by way of appellate provisions ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2406 (2018) 07 HC The petitioner assessee had not submitted his return of income an audit reports for the relevant …
