Tag: petition u/s 154
CIT(A) directed to consider rectification application u/s 154 against CPC adjustment made u/s 143(1)(a) In a recent judgment, ITAT has directed CIT(A), NFAC to consider rectification application filed by assessee u/s 154 against CPC adjustment made u/s 143(1)(a). ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3889 (2024) (03) ITAT In the …
ITAT allows exemption u/s 11 when audit report in Form 10B was uploaded but could not be approved due to technical glitch In a recent judgment ITAT has allowed the exemption u/s 11 when audit report in Form 10B was uploaded within due date but could not be …
Rectification application u/s 154 for claim of leave salary encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA) dismissed as barred by limitation In a recent judgment, ITAT has dismissed a plea for claim for leave salary encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA) as the rectification application u/s 154 was made nearly after eight years. …
Non-issuance of the notice u/s 154(3) is a procedural irregularity. ITAT directs AO to issue notice and give opportunity ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3812 (2023) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Chockalingam & Meyyappan Vs. CIT (1963) 48 ITR 34 In the instant case, the assessee …
Credit for TCS made in the hands of partner allowed to partnership firm. If ultimate conclusion on application u/s 154 can only be one particular conclusion then it can be said that the issue is debatable – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 3658 (2023) (02) ITAT Important …
For typographical error assessee has to invoke Section 154 not Appellate Jurisdiction to rectify mistakes committed during assessment proceedings – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3626 (2022) (12) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in sustaining the additions. The …
Period of limitation against rectification order can not be counted from the date of assessment order ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3403 (2020) (10) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in dismissing the appeal of the assessee merely on the …
Withdrawal of deduction u/s 54/54F beyond scope of rectification u/s 154. AO has no jurisdiction to re-appreciate evidences already considered. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3294 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:T.S. Balaram, Income Tax Officer vs Volkart Brothers & Ors, 82 ITR 50 …
Income wrongly declared in ITR by mistake cannot be taxed because assessee has not earned it. There is no provision in the Act to do so. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 3052 (2019) (07) ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the …
Addition u/s 40(a)(ia) in rectification proceedings u/s 154 upheld as question of second proviso being prospective was not debatable in view of jurisdiction High Court decision ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2983 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: CIT vs. Ansal Landmark Townships …
