Tag: supreme court
Tendering Process was not vitiated by quoting wrong GST rates/HSN Code by Suppliers – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3607 (2022) (08) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by partiesReliance Energy Ltd. 2007) 8 SCC 1Sarvesh Refractories (P) Ltd. (2007)13 SCC 601Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd (2012) 5 …
Petition in Supreme Court by lower middle income group who can’t afford expensive litigation with the help of SC Middle Income Group Legal Aid Society Ministry of Law & Justic Press Release Dated 16-02-2017 Now It is Easier to File Petition for Poor Now, it is easier for …
There is no requirement of the certificate under Tonnage Tax Scheme u/s 115VD in relation to the vessel on which slot charter operations are carried out – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 967 2016 (07) SC Question before the Court: Is the income derived from ‘slot charter’ …
Penalty us 271C-Contumacious conduct of assessee necessary to be established before penalty for failure to deduct tax at source (TDS) can be imposed-Supreme Court Case Details: Civil Appeal No. 1704 of 2008 Commr. of Income Tax Delhi (Appellant) vs. Bank of Nova Scotia (Respondent) Date of Judgment: 07/01/2016 Coram: …
Compliance of natural justice in disciplinary inquiry necessary-Supreme Court The Supreme Court in a recent judgment has dwelt upon the compliance of principles of natural justice in a disciplinary inquiry and summarised the emerging points on the subject. Case Details: Civil Appeal No. 2265 of 2011 Chamoli District Co-operative Bank Ltd. & …
Period when reference was made to IAC u/s 144B (now 144BA) to be excluded while computing the period of limitation u/s 153. Section 144B not to apply only in that case where the IAC exercises the powers or performs the functions of an ITO-Supreme Court. Case Law Details: Civil …
Juridical seat of Arbitration attracts law of the location. In such cases Part I of the Arbitration Act would not have any application-Supreme Court Case Law Details: Civil Appeals Nos. 5131-5133 of 2016 Eitzen Bulk A/S …. Appellants vs. Ashapura Minechem Ltd. & ANR. ..Respondents Civil Appeal No. 5136 of 2016 Ashapura …
Encashment of Bank Guarantee of contractor against disputed claim of damages not permitted unless adjudicated by Court of law in judicial proceedings -Supreme Court Case Law Details: Civil Apeal No. 4814 of 2016 M/s Gangotri Enterprises Ltd. Appellant(s) VERSUS Union of India & Ors. Respondent(s) Date of Judgment: 05/05/2016 …
In a recent judgment, Supreme Court has upheld that special audit u/s 142(2A) was an integral step towards assessment proceedings and hence High Court was right in holding that period for which special audit was stayed shall be excluded in counting limitation for concluding block assessment u/s 158BE. Case Law …
The Supreme Court in its recent judgment has held that tips collected by the hotel from customers and distributed to employees are not salary for the purpose of TDS under Section 192. Case Law Details: Civil Appeal Nos. 4435-37 of 2016 ITC Limited Gurgaon (Appellant) versus Commissioner of IT (TDS) Delhi (Respondent) …
