Tag: validity of notice u/s 148

Addition made on the basis of cancelled money receipt found during search quashed as its contents was not confronted with issuer ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3401 (2020) (10) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties: In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed …

Reopening notice u/s 148 quashed as it did not mention source of information or reference to person giving information ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3398 (2020) (10) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Meenakshi Overseas Private LimitedSignature Hotels Pvt. Limited vs ITO Reopening Notice u/s 148 quashed …

Reassessment made by issue of notice 143(2) before filing of return of income is invalid and not sustainable in the eyes of law ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3394 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Singhad Technical Society 397 ITR 344.Fast Booking (I) Pvt. Ltd. …

Reassessment quashed as void ab-initio for service of notice u/s 148 at wrong address when assessee had communicated changed new address ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3392 (2020) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in rejecting the objection raised …

Without cogent reasons for belief towards escapement, even a non-filer can not be forced to file a return u/s 147. ITAT held notice u/s 147 bad in Law ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3391 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Shri Ravindrasinh N. Gohil vs. …

CIT need not to given separate reasons for his satisfaction in giving approval u/s 151 for reopening of assessment if reasons recorded by AO have a direct nexus with the information and formation of belief of income escapement.  ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3388 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case …

Reassessment completed without serving notice u/s 143(2) invalid. Issue and service of notice are jurisdictional requirements ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3377 (2020) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Chetan Gupta 382 ITR 613 In the instant case, the assessee had raised additional grounds …

Second reopening notice u/s 148 issued without completing earlier reassessment proceedings is invalid ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3370 (2020) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:A.S.S.P. & Co. vs. CIT 172 ITR 274 (Mad)CIT vs. P. Krishnankutty Menon, 181 ITR 237 (Ker)Tao Publishing (P) Ltd. …

Section 292BB not applicable to legal representative. High Court quashed reopening notice issued in the name of deceased assessee. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3332 (2020) (07) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Maruti Suzuki India  Limited, (2019) 416 ITR 613 …

Assessee must be put to notice of all provisions on which revenue relies upon. Supreme Court quashed reopening notice u/s 148 ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3293 (2020) (04) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Claggett Brachi Co. Ltd. London 1989 Supp(2) SCC 182M/s Phool Chand Bajrang …