High Courts Archive

DG Income Tax-Exemptions action illegal in not taking decision on assessee’s application seeking approval under Section 80 IB(7)(c)-Allahabad HC

Author: | Categories: High Courts, Income Tax, Judgments No comments
DG Income Tax-Exemptions action illegal in not taking decision on assessee’s application seeking approval under Section 80 IB(7)(c)-Allahabad HC ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1138 (2017) (02) HC The Substantial Question of Law in assessee’s appeal: Whether the finding recorded by the Tribunal to the effect that after 13.12.2011

No Interference with findings of facts unless relevant evidence not considered or finding arrived by ITAT placing reliance on inadmissible evidence-Allahabad High Court

Author: | Categories: High Courts, Income Tax, Judgments No comments
No Interference with findings of facts unless relevant evidence not considered or finding arrived by ITAT placing reliance on inadmissible evidence-Allahabad High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1137 (2017) (02) HC Assessment Year : 2009-10 Date/Month of Pronouncement: February, 2017 Brief Facts of the Case: The appeal was admitted by the Lucknow Bench

CA guilty of misconduct-director of companies without permission, operating bank accounts actively involved in daily operation.

Author: | Categories: High Courts, ICAI, Judgments No comments
CA guilty of misconduct-director of companies without permission, operating bank accounts actively involved in the day to day operations. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1130 (2017) (02) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The instant Reference under Section 21(5) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 was made by the

Limitation Period us 153-Contention was that ITAT had set aside Assessment order of CIT-A only and not that of the AO-Allahabad HC Judgment

Author: | Categories: High Courts, Income Tax, Judgments No comments
Limitation Period us 153-Contention was that ITAT had set aside Assessment order of CIT-A only and not order of the Assessing Officer-Allahabad HC Judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1123 (2017) (02) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT Vs Purshottamdas T. Patel, reported in 209 ITR 52 (Guj.)

CA Misconduct-Non reporting book entry stocks debtors sales and accounts manipulation which was statutory requirement

Author: | Categories: High Courts, ICAI, Judgments No comments
CA Misconduct-Non reporting book entry stocks debtors sales and  accounts manipulation. Reporting modus operandi of bogus transactions was statutory requirement-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1120 (2017) (02) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) received a complaint

CA misconduct-Share application money receipt fake certificate. CA held guilty for consciously omitting date of cheques encashment-High Court

Author: | Categories: High Courts, ICAI, Judgments No comments
CA misconduct-Share application money receipt fake certificate. CA held guilty for consciously omitting date when the cheques were encashed-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1119 (2017) (02) HC Brief Facts of the Case: A company invited applications for allotment of 1,80,00,000 preferential shares for cash at par. Subsequently,

Time barred appeals can not be entertained under Article 226 by High Court

Author: | Categories: EPFO, High Courts, Judgments No comments
Time barred appeals can not be entertained under Article 226 by High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1115 (2017) (02) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Commissioner of Custom and Central Excise v. Hango Indian Pvt. Limited M/s Hindustan Times vs. Union of India Panopharma vs. UOI  
error: Content is protected ! Share the page link instead