Fact finding committee report under RTI Act can not be denied if report was submitted and action was taken. Section 8(1)(h) was not applicable-Delhi HC ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1099 (2017) (01) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The petitioner had challenged order of the Central Information Commission
PIL not maintainable in service matters in view of several Supreme Court Judgments. Service matters a writ petition cannot be filed on behalf of an association for various individual persons -High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1098 (2017) (01) HC Important Case Laws Cited: Bholanath Mukherjee and Others
Admitted pending petitions not become non-existent or nullity by filing fresh writ. The Idea of filing fresh petition to get earlier admitted writs petitions heard rejected by High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1074 (2016) (12) HC Important Case Laws cited: B. Srinivasa Reddy Vs. Karnataka Urban Water
Delhi HC-weddings cash withdrawal limits not unjustified and unwarranted as the rigid conditions apply only when payments exceeds Rs. 10000/- ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1069 (2016) (11) HC Important Case Laws cited: Parisons Agrotech (P) Ltd. v. Union of India (2015) 9 SCC 657, Manohar Lal Sharma v.
Imprest account not necessarily part of partner capital account as held by ITAT was based merely on partner’s statement without properly analysing the evidence-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1068 (2016) (11) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The responding assessee was a partnership fir. The return of
Interest on loan for declaring dividend allowable deduction u/s 36(1)(iii) even in absence of profits/reserves and the treatment of such dividend as loans in the books of the company – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1066 (2016) (11) HC Assessment Year: 2008-09 Date/Month of Judgment/Order: 07-11-2016 Important Case
ITAT duty bound to grant relief even if no specific ground raised. Even without alternative submission, Tribunal must pass consequential orders suo motu. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1062 (2016) (11) HC Important Case Laws considered: CIBA of India Ltd vs. CIT (1993) 202 ITR 0001 (Bombay High Court) CIT