Category: High Courts
Compensation made to the flat allottees for surrendering rights allowed as business expenditure of the assessee in view of Completed Contract Method of Accounting ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2843 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Shahzada Nand & Sons v. CIT, Patiala …
Transporters/Trucks owners can be proceeded against under UPGST Act despite not doing business in respect of sale/ purchase of goods – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2837 (2019) (03) HC In the instant case, the petitioners were the Truck owners who challenged the individual notices issued …
Section 50C can be applied after claiming exemption u/s 54EC of the Income Tax Act. Any other interpretation would render the provisions redundant – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2836 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT Vs. Amarchand N. Shroff, (1963) 48 ITR 59 (SC) CIT Vs. Vadilal Lallubhai (1972) 86 ITR 2 (SC) K.P. …
No deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) when assessee not the beneficial owner of shares. Issue pending before larger bench of Supreme Court was not relevant – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2835 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Universal Medicare National Travel …
Seat of ITAT not AO decides jurisdiction of High Court to which appeal would lie. High Court explains the law on jurisdiction over ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2834 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT Vs. Sahara India Financial Corp. Ltd. …
Amount forfeited on default of installment for purchase of property was capital in nature as the amount was fixed irrespective of which installment the assessee failed to pay – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2833 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Commissioner …
Settlement Commission not precluded from proceeding despite non disclosure of prosecution for the period in question as pre-requisites not require so. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2831 (2019) (03) HC The Petitioner Income Tax Department had approached the Hon’ble High Court for quashing the order of the Income …
Simply because order of Settlement Commission was not liked by department, it would not invite different opinion by the High Court unless order is questioned on merits or manner of discharge or on perversity ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2830 (2019) (03) HC In the instant case, the …
Write off for non moving stores based on technical committee recommendation pursuant to an audit objection raised by the C&AG allowed by High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2829 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Forest Industries Travancore Ltd. v. Commissioner of …
Interest u/s 11BB of Central Excise Act 1944 payable even for delayed refund of Unutilized CENVAT credit under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules & Notification dated 18.6.2012 – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2826 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the …