Tag: search u/s 132
No prosecution u/s 275B when electronic gadgets and ERP user IDs and passwords was provided to search party – Sessions Court In a recent judgment, the Sessions court has set aside the summon order holding hat Vague or incongruous answers to questions do not attract section 275B except …
Under section 271AAB undisclosed income also means additional income due to bogus expense recorded in the books of accounts – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3820 (2023) (11) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:ACIT vs. Sri Mahender Kumar AgarwalCIT vs. Harjeev Aggarwal, 70 taxmann.com 95 Radhey …
To attract provisions of section 69A sine qua non is “ownership” of money etc. which is not recorded in the books of account not mere presumption- ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3819 (2023) (11) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Common cause v. UOI 77 taxmann.com 245 …
Explanation that jewellery was acquired out of agricultural income of Bigger HUF before its partition cannot be termed as not plausible – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3753 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition …
There is no provision in the Income Tax Act to tax the difference between value of jewellery declared and jewellery found in search as deemed sale ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3744 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) …
Addition based on projected income surrendered during search deleted as actual gross income reported in audited accounts was higher ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3738 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the Revenue had challenged the order passed by CIT(A)/FAA deleting the addition for undisclosed profit made by …
Drawings and returned income speak volumes about richness of family – ITAT deleted addition for jewellery found during search. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3737 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Ashok Chaddha vs. ITO 14 taxman.com 57 In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order …
Amendment to Section 153C vide Finance Act, 2015 applicable to searches conducted u/s 132 before 01.06.2015 – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3698 (2023) (04) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Pepsico India Holdings Private Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, 2014 SCC OnLine Del …
Period of limitation for block assessment u/s 158BC/158BE commences from the date of last Panchnama, not the date of last authorization – SC ABCAUS Neutral Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3692 (2023) (03) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:C. Ramaiah Reddy v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, (2011)244 …
Onus to explain investment sources by wife discharged when she and her husband both admitted that husbands paid the money – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3644 (2023) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the addition …
