Author: administrator
Notices u/s 133(6) not enough for verification of loan transactions from shell companies. AO ought to have done further inquiry to ascertain genuineness & creditworthiness – High Court Notice under Section 133(6) of the Act is not enough to verify identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of transactions from shell …
Reference in second contract to first contract, would not make arbitration clause ipso facto be applicable to second contract – Supreme Court When there is a reference in the second contract to the terms and conditions of the first contract, the arbitration clause would not ipso facto be …
Mere use of term Islamic world or Islamic Scholars in objects would not make trust created only for a religious community or cast – ITAT In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble ITAT has held that mere use of term Islamic world in objects and particularly the Islamic Scholars …
Disallowance u/s 43B deleted as GST payable was not debited to Profit & Loss account and was paid before due date for filing return of income. In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble ITAT has deleted disallowance u/s 43B as GST payable reported in Tax Audit Report was not …
FAQs – RBI Master Direction on Credit Card and Debit Card – Issuance and Conduct Directions, 2022 Query 1. What should a customer do if a credit card is issued without his/her consent (unsolicited card)? Response: Card issuers are prohibited from issuing unsolicited credit cards and are required to …
Extension of applicability of Peer Review Mandate for CA Firms covered under Phase II & III. Revised Applicability of ICAI Peer Review Mandate According to FAQ on Peer Review Board issued by ICAI the term “peer” means a person of similar standing. The term “review” means a general …
No disallowance for delayed deposit of PF/ESI prior to judgment of Supreme Court Disallowance of u/s 36(1)(va) for delayed deposit of employees share of PF/ESI contribution prior to the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court being debatable, CPC could not have made adjustments u/s 143(1) – ITAT In a …
No pre-deposit requirement of tax/advance tax u/s 249(4)(b) before appeal to CIT(A) in case of no admitted or undisputed tax – ITAT In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble ITAT has held that in case of no admitted or undisputed tax, pre-deposit requirement under Section 249(4)(b) of the Income …
Typographical error in the e-way bill is a minor error therefore imposition of penalty under Section 129 of the GST Act is without jurisdiction and illegal– Allahabad High Court In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has quashed and set aside set aside a penalty order …
Penalty proceedings can not be launched u/s 129(3) of GST Act subsequent to search and seizure carried out under Section 67 of the Act – Allahabad High Court In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Hon’ble High Court has set aside a penalty order passed u/s 129(3) of GST …
