Author: administrator
Addition 69A deleted for cash deposit in bank during demonetisation period as the AO did not follow source specific general verification guidelines of CBDT. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble High Court of Chhattisgarh has deleted addition 69A for unexplained cash deposit in bank during demonetisation period as the …
Income Tax Officer is “victim” and have right to appeal under CrPC/BNS against acquittal of accused of default in deposit of TDS u/s 276B rws 278B of Income Tax Act. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court held that Income Tax Officer (ITO) is “victim” …
Addition made by CPC as per Clause 16(b) of Tax Audit Report deleted as it was not stated in the report that it was income of the assessee In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has deleted addition made by CPC on the basis of disclosure in Clause 16(b) …
Supreme Court issues guidelines in case of common enquiry/investigation by two different GST authorities Supreme Court issues guidelines where after the commencement of an inquiry or investigation by one GST authority, another inquiry or investigation on the same subject matter is initiated by a different GST authority. ABCAUS …
There is no bar to a taxpayer for making a claim by a letter without filing a revised return in a case u/s 143(3) of the Act – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Rajkot has held that there is no bar to a taxpayer for making a …
Appointment of Chartered Accountants firm to carry out the work of Tax Audit & filling of income tax return of Haryana Agro Industries Corporation Ltd for the financial year 2024-25 The Haryana Agro Industries Corporation (HAIC) Ltd., Panchkula has invited quotations from the Chartered Accountants firms empanelled with …
Permitting non signatory to remain present in the arbitration proceedings is beyond the scope of Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that permitting non signatory / stranger to remain present in the arbitration proceedings before the …
ITAT deleted penalty u/s 270A for non specification as to whether assessee misreported the income or under reported In a recent judgment, ITAT Jaipur has deleted penalty u/s 270A for non specification as to whether assessee misreported the income or under reported. It was also held that when …
Advance received by Managing Director / shareholder held deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) though repaid within two months. In a recent judgment Hon’ble Bombay High Court has upheld that business advance received by the Managing Director/shareholder of the company though repaid within two months constituted “deemed dividend” within the …
ITAT upheld claim of deduction on account of embezzlement of funds unearthed during the relevant assessment year In a recent judgment, ITAT Mumbai has upheld claim of deduction on account of embezzlement of funds unearthed during assessment year following the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court …
