Category: High Courts
Income Tax Act does not invite any pre-deposit for stay of demand. 20 per cent amount prescribed by CBDT Instruction can be reduced at the discretion of AO-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2882 (2019) (04) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties The …
Revisional order u/s 263 quashed following rule of consistency, Revenue argued that the principle of res judicata has no application in tax law ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2881 (2019) (04) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Income Tax Officer v. DG Housing Projects Limited …
There is distinction between questions of law proposed by appellant for admission of appeal and questions framed by Court – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2880 (2019) (04) SC In the instant case, the appeal was filed against the judgment passed by the High Court dismissing the appeal of the Income Tax Department. The …
Revision of settlement application u/s 245C(1) offering another higher amount not allowed as assessee has to make full and true disclosure ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2878 (2019) (04) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Ajmera Housing Corporation and another v Commissioner of Income Tax …
Sale of property mortgaged to bank liable to capital gain tax. Encumbrance created as a guarantee by assessee not deductible u/s 48 of Income Tax Act, 1961 ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2875 (2019) (04) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties M. Arunachalam V. CIT, …
High Court imposes penalty of Rs. 50,000/ on Income Tax Department for harassment of assessee in illegally attaching bank account and denying stay of demand ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2862 (2019) (04) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties KEC International Ltd. Vs. B.R. Balkrishnan, 251 ITR 158MMRDA Vs. Deputy DIT (Exemption) (2015) 230 Taxman 178 In the instant case, …
Attachment of Property under PMLA and bonafide third party claim – High Court explain the law and Prerequisites for a valid claim ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2858 (2019) (04) HC In the instant case law, several appeals had been filed under Section 42 of the Prevention …
Make My Trip was not liable to deduct TDS on gateway charges payments to Banks – High Court upheld ITAT action in deleting addition u/s 40(a)(ia) ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2850 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Commissioner of Income Tax v …
Share application money received vastly in excess of the authorized capital was valid reasons to issue reassessment notice u/s 148 – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2849 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Sheo Nath Singh vs. ACIT, 82 ITR 148 …
Compensation made to the flat allottees for surrendering rights allowed as business expenditure of the assessee in view of Completed Contract Method of Accounting ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2843 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Shahzada Nand & Sons v. CIT, Patiala …