Category: High Courts
UP Government to form new committee to deal cases where GST Tran-1 could not be filed on last date i.e. 27.12.2017 due to technical glitches in GSTN The Uttar Pradesh Government to form a new committee to take care of the individual cases where the dealers could not …
Seizure of goods for inadvertent mistake in two digits of truck number in e way bill was nothing but harassment of dealer. The High Court directed release of goods ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2542 (2018) 09 HC The Petitioner had filed a writ petition with prayer …
Allahabad High Court directs Nagar Aayukt, Nagar Nigam to decide Petitioner’s objections with regard to the assessment made towards his house tax ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2541 (2018) 09 HC Allahabad High Court has directed Nagar Aayukt, Nagar Nigam, Kanpur to decide Petitioner’s objections with regard to …
High Court explains the law of taxation of agent / representative assessee u/s 163 who is liable to tax on both-income directly or indirectly arising / accruing in India through a business connection PILCOM treated agent u/s 163 of non-resident Foreign Cricket Boards liable to tax on income …
State GST Officers can also search, seizure and levy penalty for violation of Central Act as provisions of the Central and State Statutes are pari materia. After 01.02.2018, seizure / Penalty orders for alleged non-accompanying of E-Way Bill by Transporters referring to Government’s old Notification and Commissioner’s Circular …
Interview call letter sent by email held valid even when postal delivery was made on the date of interview making attendance impossible ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2522 (2018) 09 HC The petitioner had applied for the post of Assistant Manager (Finance) in government corporation. The main case of the …
Commissioner DVAT directed to issue time barred F-Forms when it was not disputed that the transactions claimed were not genuine – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2521 (2018) 09 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, Department …
Approved gratuity fund contributions paid in respect of employees taken over by the company eligible for deduction under Section 36(1)(v) – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2520 (2018) 09 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Commissioner of Income Tax v. Textool Co.Ltd. Commissioner …
Settlement Commission has power to reject Application at three stages. Bar u/s 245K(2) is not in respect of application for a future assessment year – HC ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2519 (2018) 09 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: C.I.T. vs. Express Newspaper Ltd., …
Reevaluation of Patent Agent Examination answer sheet not permissible as policy adopted by CGPDTM prohibited reevaluation/reassessment -High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2518 (2018) 09 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Ran Vijay Singh & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.: (2018) …