Category: Income Tax
Adjustment u/s 143(1) by CPC unsustainable if assessment completed u/s 143(3) accepting the return of income – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3713 (2023) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the NFAC/CIT(A) in confirming  the adjustment made by the CPC …
CBDT approves National Institute of Design, Ahmedabad under the category of ‘University, College or Other Institution’ for ‘Scientific Research’ u/s 35(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 MINISTRY OF FINANCE(Department of Revenue)(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) Notification No. 23/2023 New Delhi, the 21st April, 2023 S.O. 1831(E).—In exercise of …
Disallowance of Interest on TDS u/s 37(1) is outside the purview of Section 143(1). ITAT allows interest as business expenditure ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3712 (2023) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon :M/s. Hebe Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.M/s. Govindam Clearing Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCITDCIT vs. M/s Narayani …
ITAT directs credit of TDS appearing in old PAN of amalgamating company to amalgamated company with another PAN ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3711 (2023) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming not granting the credit of tax …
There is no absolute proposition of law that arm’s length price determined by ITAT is final and cannot be subjected to judicial scrutiny in an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3710 (2023) (04) SC Important Case Laws relied upon :PCIT …
No liability for TDS when buyers deducted commission and remit only net amount – ITAT quashed disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3709 (2023) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:CIT vs. Super Religare Laboratories Ltd. 133 taxmann.com 313 (Bombay) In the instant case, the assessee had …
Statement recorded u/s 132(4) is not sacrosanct merely because assessee failed to demonstrate any coercion and duress – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3708 (2023) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in upholding   the addition of undisclosed income …
Assessee cannot be asked to explain the bank transactions of an unrelated party  – ITAT deleted addition u/s 69A ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3707 (2023) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition representing alleged unexplained gold …
Mere providing evidence relied upon by AO no substitute of fundamental right of opportunity for cross-examination – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3705 (2023) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Andaman Timber Industries vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, 314 ELT 641 (SC)I.C.D.S. Ltd. vs CIT 273 …
Section 69 & 115BBE not applicable on excess stock generated out of business income ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3704 (2023) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the action of Assessing Officer (AO) by considering the disclosure …
