Category: Income Tax
Income Tax Bill 2025 passed by Lok Sabha. CBDT issues Supplementary FAQs . CBDT issues Supplementary FAQs on Income Tax Bill 2025 The Lok Sabha on 25th March 2025 passed the Income Tax Bill 2025 with amendments. FAQ.1: Amendment of Section 9A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 Q.1. …
CBDT notifies amendments in Income Tax Rules 1962 to expand the scope of Safe Harbour Rules Section 92BC of the Income Tax Act 1961 inter alia empowers the CBDT to make safe harbour rules for the determination of arm’s length price under section 92C or section 92CA. The …
Reassessment quashed as the alleged transaction were clearly mentioned, reflected and contained in the Income Tax Returns filed by the assessee. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka quashed reassessment proceedings as the transactions referred to in notice u/s 148A(b) and order passed u/s 148A(d) were …
Penalty order quashed as show cause notice and opportunity of personal hearing was wrapped up in 48 hours In a recent judgment, Hon’ble High Court of Himanchal Pradesh quashed penalty order as the show cause notice and opportunity of personal hearing was wrapped up in 48 hours. ABCAUS …
Department can’t suo motu issue a new PAN when assesseee have a valid PAN under which returns are filed. In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Patna High Court quashed re-assessment order as notices and the assessment order showed a new PAN number suo motu issued by the department …
Sundry creditors are not loans or advances where creditworthiness to give advances is essential point for examination – ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT Lucknow has held that sundry creditors do not represent loans or advances taken by the assessee where creditworthiness to extending the advances are …
ITAT is required to examine correctness of the findings recorded by appellate authority and record conclusion why such findings are not acceptable In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court has held the ITAT over-turning the order passed by the appellate authority was required to examine the …
Approved Resolution Plan is binding on Income Tax Department. Demands raised subsequently are invalid – Supreme Court In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that the approved Resolution Plan is binding on the Income Tax Department and any subsequent demand raised are invalid. ABCAUS Case …
Statements recorded u/s 131(1A) instead of section 133A(iii) by survey team were invalid hence no addition can be made merely on the basis of invalid statements – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Chennai has held that statements recorded u/s 131(1A) instead of section 133A(iii) by the survey …
ITAT was not justified in declining admission of additional evidence without recording finding those documents were not necessary for deciding the case. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Chhattisgarh High Court held that ITAT was not justified in declining the application for admission of additional evidence as it did …