Category: ITAT
Sale of client relationship and goodwill by CA firm was of capital asset u/s 2(14) chargeable to tax under the head capital gain and deduction u/s 54EC was allowable – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2867 (2019) (04) ITAT The appellant assessee was a partnership firm carrying …
Capital introduced by partner can not be taxed in firms hand as undisclosed income. It could be added in the hands of partners only – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2866 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties India Rice Mills vs. CIT …
DVO reference u/s 55A invalid where value was more than FMV as on April 1, 1981 as per approved valuer’s report submitted by assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2865 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) vs Hotel Joshi …
No concealment penalty for bonafide error of chartered accountant in claiming wrong deduction u/s 80IC by choosing incorrect initial assessment year ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2864 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Price Water Coopers reported in 348 ITR 306 Zoom Communication …
There is no concept of pre bargaining under Income Tax Act – ITAT dismisses delayed quantum appeal filed after initiation of penalty proceedings ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2863 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji 167 ITR …
Sale of land made by partnership firm can not be added in partner’s hand. Assessment has to be done in the right hands ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2861 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties ITO Vs. Ch. Atchaiah reported at 218 ITR …
Loss by shop burglary arisen during the course of business allowed u/s 37(1) even when Insurance company assessed loss at lower amount – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2859 (2019) (04) ITAT This appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax …
Interest cost for the period for which capital asset was held by the assessee prior to sale not deductible u/s 48 in computing capital gain u/s 45 ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2852 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Habib Hussein v. CIT …
Issue of notice u/s 143(2) on the same day return was filed made the entire assessment illegal for being non application of mind by the AO – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has held that issue of notice u/s 143(2) on the same day return was …
Mere agreeing to increased net profit rate, by itself was no ground to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) when it was already higher compared to preceding assessment years – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2840 (2019) (03) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Harigopal Singh …
