Category: ITAT

Reopneing-AO had to act on the basis of reasons to believe and not on reasons to suspect. ITAT quashed the reopening of the assessment. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2916 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Aas per AIR information, assessee had sold …

Non doctor running a hospital is not a professional for tax audit turnover limit purpose, but it is a business activity – ITAT deletes penalty u/s 271B ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2914 (2019) (05) ITAT The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A) …

Unaccounted tax liabilities to be deducted from reserves for levy of deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e). AO should consider the liability while considering the status of the accumulated profit of the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2911 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties …

No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) without addition-Quantification of penalty depended upon addition made to the income of the assessee – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2910 (2019) (05) ITAT The assessee was in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the CIT(A) in confirming the penalty imposed by …

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for inadvertently not showing salary from second employer deleted as assessee suo moto recalculated and paid the tax along with interest ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2908 (2019) (05) ITAT The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income …

Expenditure on advertisement and brand promotion allowed in the year in which incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of business ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2907 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Madras Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd. v. CIT 225 ITR 802 …

Dismissing appeal ex-parte by CIT(A) on very first date of hearing without giving proper opportunity to the assessee to prepare the case was unjustified – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2906 (2019) (05) ITAT The appeal by Assessee was directed against the Order of the CIT(A) whereby …

When bank interest was declared in ITR, it cannot be said that bank account was not disclosed to the Revenue ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2904 (2019) (05) ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the Assessee against the Order of the CIT(A) on the issue of addition …

Limited scrutiny order passed by AO was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of Revenue as enquiries were focused and limited – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2902 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Malabar Industrial Co Ltd Vs. CIT’ (2008) …

Expenditure incurred on discontinued business unless shown to be incurred for reviving it not allowable under section 37(1) – ITAT   ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2901 (2019) (05) ITAT The sole issue raised by the assessee was the maintainability of the disallowance of expenditure incurred for maintenance …