Category: ITAT
In the absence of finding as to the year of purchase, jewellery found in locker would not represent the undisclosed income as defined in the explanation to section 271AAB of the Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2887 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by …
Rectification order u/s 154 quashed due to doctrine of merger. Questions expressly decided by appellate/revisional authority cannot be reagitated u/s 154 ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2886 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Rajputana Mining Agencies & others vs ITO (1979) 118 ITR …
Difference in Tribunal and non jurisdictional High Court amounts to two opposite views despite that decision of High Court rendered after ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2884 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Gouli Mahadevappa vs. ITO 356 ITR 90 (Karn) Prakash …
Addition made by AO in limited scrutiny by extending scope deleted as AO did not take due permission to convert it into full scrutiny. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2883 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the partiesCIT Vs. Mekala Balreddy The appeal in the instant …
Without stating whether notices were served on assessee, CIT(A) was not justified in dismissing the appeal of the assessee for non-appearance – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2879 (2019) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal of the assessee on the ground …
No disallowance for interest paid on capital work in progress u/s 36(1)(iii) where sufficient interest-free funds available, presumption is that investments were out of such funds ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2877 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Hero Cycles Pvt. Ltd. Vs. …
Penalty u/s 271AAB for undisclosed income declared deleted for no incriminating material found during search and also for notice non specifying the specific limb ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2876 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the partiesSSA’s Emerald Meadows, (2016) 73 taxmann.com 248(SC)Manjunatha Cotton & …
Addition u/s 68 made without issuing notice to creditors deleted by ITAT as AO failed to conduct inquiry. Had creditors not responded, addition might be justified ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2874 (2019) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee was in appeal before the Tribunal against …
Sale of client relationship and goodwill by CA firm was of capital asset u/s 2(14) chargeable to tax under the head capital gain and deduction u/s 54EC was allowable – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2867 (2019) (04) ITAT The appellant assessee was a partnership firm carrying …
Capital introduced by partner can not be taxed in firms hand as undisclosed income. It could be added in the hands of partners only – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2866 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties India Rice Mills vs. CIT …
