Category: ITAT
No Penalty u/s 271B where assessee under bona-fide belief failed to get accounts audited u/s 44AB despite turnover exceeding threshold for sale/purchase of shares ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3216 (2020) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal had been filed at the instance of the Assessee against …
Notice for initiation of complete scrutiny assessment proceeding prior to receipt of approval by Pr. CIT i.e. in anticipation of approval is invalid ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3214 (2019) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:M/s. CBS International Projects Pvt. Ltd vs CIT In the …
Claim of exemption u/s 10 for agricultural land not liable to penalty u/s 271(1)(c). ITAT directed Assessing Officer to delete the penalty. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3214 (2019) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Shri Prakash Raj Bhansali vs ITO In the instant case, an …
Additions agreed during assessment proceedings can be challenged in appeal when assessee itself not made disallowance in return of income ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3213 (2020) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Everest Kento Cylinders Ltd (2015)(58 taxmann.com 254)(378 ITR 57), In the …
Partners remuneration / interest on capital allowable from estimated profit. ITAT allows deductions following decision of Jurisdictional High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3212 (2019) (12) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Vijay Constructions 213 CTR 105M/s B. Durga Reddy & Co.M/s. K. Venkata Raju, Rajahmundry …
No merit in holding that estimated addition has to be made on account of fall in gross profit rate. ITAT deleted addition ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3211 (2019) (12) ITAT In the instant case, appeal was filed by assessee against the order of CIT(A) on the issue of …
When cash deposit was fully explained no peak credit addition was required as directed by ITAT while remitting the matter back to Assessing Officer ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3210 (2019) (12) ITAT The single issue involved in the instant case was confirmation by the CIT(A)of the addition made …
Penalty 271B deleted as accountant had to look after business activities due to assessee neurological problem. Hence he failed to coordinate with Auditor’s office ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3207 (2019) (12) ITAT In the instant case the appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the …
Addition for bogus purchase deleted as AO conducted enquiry u/s 133(6) from the different supplier having name similar to actual creditor ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3206 (2019) (12) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A) on the solitary …
Doctors retainership fee held taxable as professional income not salary. The agreement demonstrated no master-servant relationship ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3205 (2019) (12) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:ACIT vs. Fortis Healthcare Ltd., 157 ITD 746ITO vs. Apollo Hospitals International Ltd., 64 SOT 302CIT vs. …