Category: ITAT
Redemption of ULIP not exempt u/s 10(10D) taxable as capital gains not income from other sources, ITAT allows benefit of indexation ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3795 (2023) (08) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in sustaining the addition made …
ITAT refused to admit additional evidence when were available with assessee before the completion of the assessment and no reasons was given as to why those were not filed before AO or CIT(A). ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3794 (2023) (08) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had …
Consideration used in section 48 does not have any reference to market value but only to consideration referred to in sale deeds as sale price of assets ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3791 (2023) (08) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Commissioner of Income tax vs Gillanders Arbuthnot & Co. …
Tax on maturity of High Premium insurance policy to be on sum received minus premium paid though TDS u/s 194DA is contemplated on the gross Amount paid – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3789 (2023) (08) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed …
When there is no other/separate source of income identified during the course of survey or during the course of assessment proceedings, any income arising to the assessee shall be treated to be out of the normal business of the assessee only ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3788 (2023) (08) …
Addition for cash payments made to builder for purchase of residential house – ITAT deletes addition for want of any clinching evidence ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3787 (2023) (08) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Dinesh Kumar Goyal vs. UOI & Others 453 ITR 535Laxmi Narain Agency vs. Income …
Only five days time allowed to reply questionnaire was not sufficient opportunity. ITAT deletes penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3786 (2023) (08) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax …
Benefit of cash deposit up to 2.50 lacs for demonetisation period not available separately for household earnings of non taxpayer wife ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3784 (2023) (07) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal was preferred by the assessee against the order passed by the passed by …
ITAT gives telescoping benefit of business income declared when the assessee was only an entry operator and addition was made for commission income In a recent judgment , the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has directed AO to give benefit of telescoping for the business income declared when the …
Delay in deposit of PF/ESI for disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) to be calculated from the month of actual payment of salary not accrual. ITAT remands case for examination ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3781 (2023) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Checkmate Pvt. Ltd. vs. CITKanoi Paper and Industries Ltd. …
