Category: ITAT
Appeal lies with CIT(A) against non-grant of TDS credit by CPC Intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3760 (2023) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Deere & Company138 taxmann.com 46 In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) …
Full year depreciation on vehicle can not be denied on the ground that registration was done later as assessee had vehicle in its possession. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3759 (2023) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (2012) 28 taxmann.com …
No remission or cessation of liability u/s 41(1) if trading liability is continued to be declared in books of account ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3758 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Vardhman Overseas Ltd. 343 ITR 408 (Del)Dattatray Poultry Breeding Farm P. Ltd. vs. ACIT (2019) 104 …
Penalty u/s 271B deleted as assessee was not aware that section 44AB related to Tax Audit was applicable to him as he was only a commission agent ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3757 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the …
A reasonable limitation period is applicable to Order u/s 206C for failure to deduct TCS although no limitation is prescribed under the Income Tax Act 1961 ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3756 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Eid Mohammad Nizamuddin vs. ITO In the instant case, the …
Preparation and uploading of fake ITR by Chartered Accountant. ITAT remands the case to AO to decide in the light of pending criminal case ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3755 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal …
Explanation that jewellery was acquired out of agricultural income of Bigger HUF before its partition cannot be termed as not plausible – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3753 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition …
Penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS can not be escaped by establishing genuineness or bona fides of the transactions – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3752 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Hareshkumar Bechardas Patel Vs. Jt. CIT (2019) 69 ITR 73 (SN) (Ahd.) (Trib.)ITO …
50 percent expenditure allowed from Consultancy services without proof of expenses in view of the provisions of section 44ADA ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3350 (2020) (07) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the order of the AO …
Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) deleted as counsel misled by filing inaccurate return and not informed of assessment and penalty notices ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3750 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Triumph International Finance India Ltd vs DCIT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order …
