Category: ITAT
ITD says mentioning correct contact & email id details in efiling portal is assessee’s mandatory duty. Ignorance of law and process not to be encouraged ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3770 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee was aggrieved by the ex-parte orders of first appellate …
When examining details, CIT(Appeals) was not clear as to nature then expenses cannot be disallowed by CPC under artificial intelligence – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3769 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the The National Faceless Appeal Centre …
Penalty u/s 271B deleted where accountant handling accounts suddenly left the job but assessee furnished audit report before completion of assessment. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3768 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the The National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC)/ …
Addition for unexplained cash deleted as assessee consistently declared tuition income and paid tax over 20 -25 years ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3767 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition made by the Assessing Officer …
Merely because assessee did not filed appeal against addition it cannot be a ground for imposing penalty – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3766 (2023) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Rajiv Kumar Garg vs. ITOCIT vs. Aero Traders (P) Ltd.Harigopal Singh vs. CIT (2002) 258 ITR 85 …
Estimating higher gross profit rate without rejecting books of account or pointing out any defects or discrepancies in the audited books of accounts not permissible ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3765 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the Revenue had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in …
Maintenance charge income received from tenants held income from business or profession not income from house property. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3764 (2023) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:M/s. Kirloskar Systems Ltd. vs. ACITCIT vs. Model Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd. (1986) 159 ITR 270CIT vs. Kanak Investments …
Addition of Mobilization Advances based on gross receipts as per 26AS statement deleted as mobilization advance was offered to tax over the life of the project ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3763 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the Department had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) …
Delay in filing appeal condoned due to mismatch in aadhaar and pan data not allowing e-verification by OTP ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3762 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the appellant assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in dismissing the assessee’s appeal in limine …
Tax Audit provisions do not apply to items of other income shown in Profit & Loss Account when business turnover is Nil – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3761 (2023) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Bajrang Oil Mills vs. ITO, 295 ITR 314Ghai Construction vs. State of …
