Category: ITAT
Adjustment u/s 143(1) by CPC unsustainable if assessment completed u/s 143(3) accepting the return of income – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3713 (2023) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the NFAC/CIT(A) in confirming the adjustment made by the CPC …
Disallowance of Interest on TDS u/s 37(1) is outside the purview of Section 143(1). ITAT allows interest as business expenditure ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3712 (2023) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon :M/s. Hebe Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.M/s. Govindam Clearing Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCITDCIT vs. M/s Narayani …
ITAT directs credit of TDS appearing in old PAN of amalgamating company to amalgamated company with another PAN ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3711 (2023) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming not granting the credit of tax …
No liability for TDS when buyers deducted commission and remit only net amount – ITAT quashed disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3709 (2023) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:CIT vs. Super Religare Laboratories Ltd. 133 taxmann.com 313 (Bombay) In the instant case, the assessee had …
Statement recorded u/s 132(4) is not sacrosanct merely because assessee failed to demonstrate any coercion and duress – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3708 (2023) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in upholding the addition of undisclosed income …
Assessee cannot be asked to explain the bank transactions of an unrelated party – ITAT deleted addition u/s 69A ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3707 (2023) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition representing alleged unexplained gold …
Mere providing evidence relied upon by AO no substitute of fundamental right of opportunity for cross-examination – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3705 (2023) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Andaman Timber Industries vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, 314 ELT 641 (SC)I.C.D.S. Ltd. vs CIT 273 …
Section 69 & 115BBE not applicable on excess stock generated out of business income ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3704 (2023) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the action of Assessing Officer (AO) by considering the disclosure …
Income Tax assessment order passed u/s 143(3) supports that party was not bogus, very much existed and carried out business – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3701 (2023) (04) ITAT In the instant appeal, the Revenue had challenged the order of CIT(A) in deleting disallowance made by the …
Payment made by family member for purchase of new property not a bar to assessee in claiming exemption u/s 54F. No one to one co-relation is essential and investment in the name of assessee made within stipulated time is entitled to exemption – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS …
