Category: ITAT
Adhoc disallowance of estimated expenses was justified in the absence of substantiation of expenses by assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3670 (2023) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Bhawani Portfolio Pvt. Ltd. In the instant case, the assessee had …
IBC has overriding affect on all the acts including Income Tax Act as specifically provided u/s 178(6) ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3669 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, both the Revenue and the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) for two Assessment Years. The …
Loss on investment written off not capital gain and hence not covered by exception to monetary limits for filing appeal ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3667 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the Revenue had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in allowing capital loss arising out …
Denial of deduction u/s 11 not filing of Audit Report in Form 10B within due date. The CIT(A) to wait till disposal of condonation application pending before CIT(Exemption) ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3666 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by …
Sales & collection of sundry debtors in SBN during demonetization period held to be assessee’s own money ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3665 (2023) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws covered:Apex Laboratories (P) Ltd. vs. DCIT (135 Taxmann.com 286)Pr. CIT vs. Agson Global Pvt. Ltd. (134 Taxmann.com 256)Madheswara Agencies vs. …
Penalty u/s 270A can not be imposed without first disposing application in Form No. 68 for immunity from penalty ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3664 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the appellant assessee had challenged the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless …
ITAT deleted penalty 271(1)(b) and 271F as explanation of the assessee was ignored by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A). ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3663 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the appellant assessee had challenged the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless …
Accumulation of charitable income u/s 11(1)(a) for incidental business is to be calculated on net profits not gross receipts. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3662 (2023) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws covered:Holy Spirit v/s. DCIT (Exemption)CIT vs. Thanthi Trust (2001) 247 ITR 785 (SC) Programme for Community Organization, (2001) …
Furnishing of return is complete for the purposes of Section 234A and Section 139 of the Act, the moment it is put in the course of transmission by way of uploading – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3660 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had …
Deductions should not be disallowed merely for any bona fide mistake or error of the taxpayer – ITAT allows Deduction u/s 80IA ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3659 (2023) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws covered:CIT vs. G. M. Knitting Industries (P) Ltd. & OthersM/s Aks Alloys (P) Ltd. 2013 …
