Category: High Courts
Settlement Commission not precluded from proceeding despite non disclosure of prosecution for the period in question as pre-requisites not require so. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2831 (2019) (03) HC The Petitioner Income Tax Department had approached the Hon’ble High Court for quashing the order of the Income …
Simply because order of Settlement Commission was not liked by department, it would not invite different opinion by the High Court unless order is questioned on merits or manner of discharge or on perversity ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2830 (2019) (03) HC In the instant case, the …
Write off for non moving stores based on technical committee recommendation pursuant to an audit objection raised by the C&AG allowed by High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2829 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Forest Industries Travancore Ltd. v. Commissioner of …
Interest u/s 11BB of Central Excise Act 1944 payable even for delayed refund of Unutilized CENVAT credit under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules & Notification dated 18.6.2012 – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2826 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the …
Challenge to the vires of PMLA Act 2002 on being passed as Money Bill dismissed as Petitioner had no locus, being not aggrieved and on account of delay ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2806 (2019) (02) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Justice K.S. Puttaswamy …
Allowability u/s 37(1) of fine /penalty for redemption of goods ordered to be confiscated for breach of import conditions – High Court explains the Law ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2801 (2019) (02) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT V/s. Ahmedabad Cotton Mfg. Co Ltd. …
Clandestine removal of goods without payment of excise duty can not be alleged on the basis of bilties/GRs recovered from transporters without conducting any investigation. – HC ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2789 (2019) (02) HC The respondent-assessee was a company registered under the Indian Companies Act and was …
Question of ITC in Building Construction Material such as Angle, Cement, H.R. Sheets, Channel, Cylinder etc. under UPVAT – High Court admits Petition ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2788 (2019) (02) HC The respondent company had claimed Input Tax Credit (I.T.C.) in regard to the Building Construction Material such …
Even if at passing the original assessment order, there is a mistake or non-application of mind, initiation of re-assessment the proceedings bad in law – HCÂ ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2785 (2019) (02) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd. Vs. …
Condonation of delay u/s 119(2)(b) for mistake of chartered accountant allowed. limitation when lead to hardships, should be construed in a reasonable manner-High Court In a recent judgment, Delhi High Court has quashed order u/s 119(2)(b) denying condonation of delay in filing refund application observing that limitation when …
