Category: High Courts
Interview call letter sent by email held valid even when postal delivery was made on the date of interview making attendance impossible ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2522 (2018) 09 HC The petitioner had applied for the post of Assistant Manager (Finance) in government corporation. The main case of the …
Commissioner DVAT directed to issue time barred F-Forms when it was not disputed that the transactions claimed were not genuine – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2521 (2018) 09 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, Department …
Approved gratuity fund contributions paid in respect of employees taken over by the company eligible for deduction under Section 36(1)(v) – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2520 (2018) 09 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Commissioner of Income Tax v. Textool Co.Ltd. Commissioner …
Settlement Commission has power to reject Application at three stages. Bar u/s 245K(2) is not in respect of application for a future assessment year – HC ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2519 (2018) 09 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: C.I.T. vs. Express Newspaper Ltd., …
Reevaluation of Patent Agent Examination answer sheet not permissible as policy adopted by CGPDTM prohibited reevaluation/reassessment -High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2518 (2018) 09 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Ran Vijay Singh & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.: (2018) …
Compensation for removing illegal encroachment not liable for TDS u/s 194L/194LA when occupants were not owners of the land on which they had built illegal huts – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2513 (2018) 09 HC The Revenue had filed the instant appeal(s) under the Income …
Set back to Rahul and Sonia Gandhi on reopening of income tax cases for Young Indian share allotment not disclosed . Delhi High Court dismisses Petitions for non disclosure of taxing event ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2510 (2018) 09 HC By the instant common judgment, the Hon’ble …
No change of opinion when there was no earlier scrutiny assessment, therefore, the reopening of assessment was not bad in law-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2502 (2018) 09 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: GKN Driveshafts India Ltd., vs. ITO, 203-259-ITR-19 The present …
Special audit 142(2A) period is excluded from limitation period in terms of clause (iv) to Explanation 1 of section 153(1). High Court Reverses ITAT Order ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2501 (2018) 09 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Ulike …
DRI orders freezing bank account was without authority of law – High Court quashed order as no allegation was that amount was liable to be confiscated ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2500 (2018) 08 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Commissioner of Customs v. Euroasia …
