Category: High Courts

CA guilty of misconduct-director of companies without permission, operating bank accounts actively involved in daily operation.

CA guilty of misconduct-director of companies without permission, operating bank accounts actively involved in the day to day operations. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1130 (2017) (02) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The instant Reference under Section 21(5) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 was made by …

Limitation Period us 153-Contention was that ITAT had set aside Assessment order of CIT-A only and not that of the AO-Allahabad HC Judgment

Limitation Period us 153-Contention was that ITAT had set aside Assessment order of CIT-A only and not order of the Assessing Officer-Allahabad HC Judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1123 (2017) (02) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT Vs Purshottamdas T. Patel, reported in 209 ITR 52 …

CA Misconduct-Non reporting book entry stocks debtors sales and accounts manipulation which was statutory requirement

CA Misconduct-Non reporting book entry stocks debtors sales and  accounts manipulation. Reporting modus operandi of bogus transactions was statutory requirement-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1120 (2017) (02) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) received a …

CA misconduct-Share application money receipt fake certificate. CA held guilty for consciously omitting date of cheques encashment-High Court

CA misconduct-Share application money receipt fake certificate. CA held guilty for consciously omitting date when the cheques were encashed-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1119 (2017) (02) HC Brief Facts of the Case: A company invited applications for allotment of 1,80,00,000 preferential shares for cash at par. …

Fact finding committee report under RTI Act can not be denied if report was submitted and action taken. Section 8(1)(h) not applicable-Delhi HC

Fact finding committee report under RTI Act can not be denied if report was submitted and action was taken. Section 8(1)(h) was not applicable-Delhi HC ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1099 (2017) (01) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The petitioner had challenged order of the Central Information …