Category: High Courts
ITAT to examine AMCs to find out whether TDS is required to be deducted under Section 194C or 194J In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Bombay High Court remanded case for re-examination of the AMCs to find out whether TDS ought to have been deducted under Section 194C or …
Money accumulated by fraud and deception not income from trade and business but is proceeds of crime – High Court In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Delhi High Court has held that money accumulated by fraud and deception can not be said to have been earned by trade and …
Payments made to honorary doctors by the hospital were professional payments liable to TDS u/s 194J not under section 192 as salary. In a recent judgment, Bombay High Court held that payments made to honorary doctors by the hospital were professional payments liable to TDS u/s 194J and …
Provision for discount allowed as expenses as it had been discharged fully in the subsequent Assessment Year. In a recent judgment, the Karnataka High Court upheld the allowance of provision for discount following the matching principle as it had been discharged fully in the subsequent Assessment Year. ABCAUS …
Order u/s 148A(d) set aside as sanctioning authority wrongly recorded that no response was filed in response to the notice issued u/s 148A(b). In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Calcutta High Court held that the order u/s 148A(d) was vitiated as the sanction granting authority had wrongly recorded that …
Assessment proceeding was vitiated by not taking cognisance of a valid revised return by which original return stood obliterated. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Tripura High Court has held that once the assessee has a right to file a revised return, and such a revised return was filed …
Seizure of goods justified when e-way bill was not generated immediately on movement of the goods but was generated after the interception of the goods. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Allahabad High Court declined to interfere with detention of goods by GST Authorities as e-way bill not generated …
Addition u/s 68 deleted as time gap between cash withdrawal and cash deposit into bank account was similar to the preceding year, establishing it was a normal feature of the assessee’s business. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Delhi High Court upheld deletion of addition u/s 68 towards cash …
High Court allowed deduction u/s 80IA allowed on interest income from fixed deposits and on interest on TDS refund In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Bombay High Court directed the Assessing Officer to grant deduction under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) to the assessee …
Seizure of jewellery held valid in view of assessee’s failure to substantiate the legitimacy of jewellery, discrepancies in documentation and weight In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Calcutta High Court held that the seizure of the jewellery was valid in view of the assessee’s failure to substantiate the legitimacy …