Category: High Courts
CA misconduct-Share application money receipt fake certificate. CA held guilty for consciously omitting date when the cheques were encashed-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1119 (2017) (02) HC Brief Facts of the Case: A company invited applications for allotment of 1,80,00,000 preferential shares for cash at par. …
Time barred appeals can not be entertained under Article 226 by High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1115 (2017) (02) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Commissioner of Custom and Central Excise v. Hango Indian Pvt. Limited M/s Hindustan Times vs. Union of India Panopharma vs. UOI …
CA Misconduct-Claiming AC First Class fare but travelling in lower class. It was an act of casualness and not an act with intention to cheat-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1113 (2017) (01) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The Comptroller and Auditor General of India …
Fact finding committee report under RTI Act can not be denied if report was submitted and action was taken. Section 8(1)(h) was not applicable-Delhi HC ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1099 (2017) (01) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The petitioner had challenged order of the Central Information …
PIL not maintainable in service matters in view of several Supreme Court Judgments. Service matters a writ petition cannot be filed on behalf of an association for various individual persons -High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1098 (2017) (01) HC Important Case Laws Cited: Bholanath Mukherjee and …
Admitted pending petitions not become non-existent or nullity by filing fresh writ. The Idea of filing fresh petition to get earlier admitted writs petitions heard rejected by High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1074 (2016) (12) HC Important Case Laws cited: B. Srinivasa Reddy Vs. Karnataka Urban …
Delhi HC-weddings cash withdrawal limits not unjustified and unwarranted as the rigid conditions apply only when payments exceeds Rs. 10000/- ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1069 (2016) (11) HC Important Case Laws cited: Parisons Agrotech (P) Ltd. v. Union of India (2015) 9 SCC 657, Manohar Lal Sharma …
Imprest account not necessarily part of partner capital account as held by ITAT was based merely on partner’s statement without properly analysing the evidence-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1068 (2016) (11) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The responding assessee was a partnership fir. The return …
Interest on loan for declaring dividend allowable deduction u/s 36(1)(iii) even in absence of profits/reserves and the treatment of such dividend as loans in the books of the company – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1066 (2016) (11) HC Assessment Year: 2008-09 Date/Month of Judgment/Order: 07-11-2016 Important …
ITAT duty bound to grant relief even if no specific ground raised. Even without alternative submission, Tribunal must pass consequential orders suo motu. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1062 (2016) (11) HC Important Case Laws considered: CIBA of India Ltd vs. CIT (1993) 202 ITR 0001 (Bombay High Court) …