Category: High Courts

DG Income Tax-Exemptions action illegal in not taking decision on assessee’s application seeking approval under Section 80 IB(7)(c)-Allahabad HC

DG Income Tax-Exemptions action illegal in not taking decision on assessee’s application seeking approval under Section 80 IB(7)(c)-Allahabad HC

February 23, 2017 High Courts, Income Tax, Judgments
DG Income Tax-Exemptions action illegal in not taking decision on assessee’s application seeking approval under Section 80 IB(7)(c)-Allahabad HC ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1138 (2017) (02) HC The Substantial Question of Law in assessee’s appeal: Whether the finding recorded by the Tribunal to the effect that after …
findings of fact

No Interference with findings of facts unless relevant evidence not considered by ITAT

February 23, 2017 High Courts, Income Tax, Judgments
No Interference with findings of facts unless relevant evidence not considered or finding arrived by ITAT placing reliance on inadmissible evidence-Allahabad High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 1137 (2017) (02) HC Assessment Year : 2009-10Date/Month of Pronouncement: February, 2017 Brief Facts of the Case:The appeal was admitted by the Lucknow Bench of the …
CA guilty of misconduct-director of companies without permission, operating bank accounts actively involved in daily operation.

CA guilty of misconduct-director of companies without permission, operating bank accounts actively involved in daily operation.

February 16, 2017 High Courts, ICAI, Judgments
CA guilty of misconduct-director of companies without permission, operating bank accounts actively involved in the day to day operations. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1130 (2017) (02) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The instant Reference under Section 21(5) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 was made by …
Limitation period

Limitation Period us 153-Contention was that ITAT had set aside Assessment order of CIT-A only and not that of the AO-Allahabad HC

February 11, 2017 High Courts, Income Tax, Judgments
Limitation Period us 153-Contention was that ITAT had set aside Assessment order of CIT-A only and not order of the Assessing Officer-Allahabad HC Judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 1123 (2017) (02) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:CIT Vs Purshottamdas T. Patel, reported in 209 ITR 52 (Guj.) Substantial …
CA Misconduct-Non reporting book entry stocks debtors sales and accounts manipulation which was statutory requirement

CA Misconduct-Non reporting book entry stocks debtors sales and accounts manipulation which was statutory requirement

February 9, 2017 High Courts, ICAI, Judgments
CA Misconduct-Non reporting book entry stocks debtors sales and  accounts manipulation. Reporting modus operandi of bogus transactions was statutory requirement-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1120 (2017) (02) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) received a …
CA misconduct-Share application money receipt fake certificate. CA held guilty for consciously omitting date of cheques encashment-High Court

CA misconduct-Share application money receipt fake certificate. CA held guilty for consciously omitting date of cheques encashment-High Court

February 8, 2017 High Courts, ICAI, Judgments
CA misconduct-Share application money receipt fake certificate. CA held guilty for consciously omitting date when the cheques were encashed-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1119 (2017) (02) HC Brief Facts of the Case: A company invited applications for allotment of 1,80,00,000 preferential shares for cash at par. …
Fact finding committee report under RTI Act can not be denied if report was submitted and action taken. Section 8(1)(h) not applicable-Delhi HC

Fact finding committee report under RTI Act can not be denied if report was submitted and action taken. Section 8(1)(h) not applicable-Delhi HC

January 11, 2017 High Courts, Judgments, RTI
Fact finding committee report under RTI Act can not be denied if report was submitted and action was taken. Section 8(1)(h) was not applicable-Delhi HC ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1099 (2017) (01) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The petitioner had challenged order of the Central Information …