Category: ITAT
Inadequate enquiry leading to assumption of incorrect facts makes the order erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue – ITAT upheld the Revision order passed u/s 263 ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2934 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Gee Vee …
Notice by affixture in the name of dead assessee showed that Tax Official actually did not went there else they could have come to know about death ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2932 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Sumit Balkrishna Gupta Vs. …
Assessment made on the basis of wrong cash book printed out from tally package with negative figures, ignoring correct cash book remanded by ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2931 (2019) (05) ITAT The appeals filed by the separate was directed against the common order of the Commissioner …
Disallowance u/s 184(5) not have cause and effect relationship with assessment being framed under section 144 – ITAT upheld additions ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2930 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties M/s. Jai Hanuman Enterprises vs ITO The appellant assessee was a …
Addition u/s 68/69 deleted for cash deposit in bank of amount returned back by father and brother out of amount gifted by assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2929 (2019) (05) ITAT The Assessing Officer (AO) AO observed that that there were cash deposits in the Bank account …
Merely printing other aims/objects as per requirement of Registrar of Societies would not disqualify it for approval u/s 10(23C)(vi) – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2928 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Harf Charitable Trust (Regd.) Malerkotla vs. Chief Commissioner of Income …
Penalty u/s 271D deleted for cash loan from father mother and brothers as loan was from close family relations and there was a reasonable cause u/s 273B ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2927 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT vs. M. …
Mere transporting goods to customers not enough to claim higher depreciation unless assessee is in business of transportation or running trucks on hire ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2925 (2019) (05) ITAT The appeal was filed by the Department (the Revenue) against the order of the Commissioner of …
Disallowance u/s 37 for penalty/demurrage for late delivery of goods not for any offence prohibited by law but merely normal business expenditure – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2924 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Mahalakshmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. vs. CIT …
Reassessment order passed without disposing objections bad in law. Dismissal of SLP by Supreme Court without assigning reasons not a declaration of law ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2922 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties National Thermal Power Co., Ltd., Vs. CIT …
