Category: ITAT
Difference in Tribunal and non jurisdictional High Court amounts to two opposite views despite that decision of High Court rendered after ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2884 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Gouli Mahadevappa vs. ITO 356 ITR 90 (Karn) Prakash …
Addition made by AO in limited scrutiny by extending scope deleted as AO did not take due permission to convert it into full scrutiny. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2883 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the partiesCIT Vs. Mekala Balreddy The appeal in the instant …
Without stating whether notices were served on assessee, CIT(A) was not justified in dismissing the appeal of the assessee for non-appearance – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2879 (2019) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal of the assessee on the ground …
No disallowance for interest paid on capital work in progress u/s 36(1)(iii) where sufficient interest-free funds available, presumption is that investments were out of such funds ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2877 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Hero Cycles Pvt. Ltd. Vs. …
Penalty u/s 271AAB for undisclosed income declared deleted for no incriminating material found during search and also for notice non specifying the specific limb ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2876 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the partiesSSA’s Emerald Meadows, (2016) 73 taxmann.com 248(SC)Manjunatha Cotton & …
Addition u/s 68 made without issuing notice to creditors deleted by ITAT as AO failed to conduct inquiry. Had creditors not responded, addition might be justified ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2874 (2019) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee was in appeal before the Tribunal against …
Sale of client relationship and goodwill by CA firm was of capital asset u/s 2(14) chargeable to tax under the head capital gain and deduction u/s 54EC was allowable – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2867 (2019) (04) ITAT The appellant assessee was a partnership firm carrying …
Capital introduced by partner can not be taxed in firms hand as undisclosed income. It could be added in the hands of partners only – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2866 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties India Rice Mills vs. CIT …
DVO reference u/s 55A invalid where value was more than FMV as on April 1, 1981 as per approved valuer’s report submitted by assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2865 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) vs Hotel Joshi …
No concealment penalty for bonafide error of chartered accountant in claiming wrong deduction u/s 80IC by choosing incorrect initial assessment year ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2864 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Price Water Coopers reported in 348 ITR 306 Zoom Communication …
