Category: ITAT
There is no concept of pre bargaining under Income Tax Act – ITAT dismisses delayed quantum appeal filed after initiation of penalty proceedings ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2863 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji 167 ITR …
Sale of land made by partnership firm can not be added in partner’s hand. Assessment has to be done in the right hands ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2861 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties ITO Vs. Ch. Atchaiah reported at 218 ITR …
Loss by shop burglary arisen during the course of business allowed u/s 37(1) even when Insurance company assessed loss at lower amount – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2859 (2019) (04) ITAT This appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax …
Interest cost for the period for which capital asset was held by the assessee prior to sale not deductible u/s 48 in computing capital gain u/s 45 ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2852 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Habib Hussein v. CIT …
Issue of notice u/s 143(2) on the same day return was filed made the entire assessment illegal for being non application of mind by the AO – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2841 (2019) (03) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Ashtech Industries Pvt. …
Mere agreeing to increased net profit rate, by itself was no ground to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) when it was already higher compared to preceding assessment years – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2840 (2019) (03) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Harigopal Singh …
Capital gain arose in the year assessee relinquished his rights in the property at the time of allotment by executing agreement to sell ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2832 (2019) (03) ITAT The Income Tax Department had challenged the order of the CIT(A) in deleting the capital gain …
Agriculture income can only be estimated by considering land holding size. Even big farmers not maintain details expected by Tax Authorities – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2823 (2019) (03) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Sumati Dayal, 214 ITR 801 Durga Prasad More, …
Addition u/s 68 for cash deposited in bank received from absconding debtor on the ground that notice sent was received back unserved, deleted ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2822 (2019) (03) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT Vs. Sun Builders, 41 taxman.com 484 (Guj) …
No obligation to deduct TDS when CIT had not rejected Form No. 15G filed by the assessee on the ground of not being filed in time – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2821 (2019) (03) ITAT The appeal in this case was filed by the assessee against …
