Category: ITAT
Corpus donation with specific purpose of purchase of lands for furtherance of the objects not income u/s 2(24)(iia) as they were capital receipts for specific purpose – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2781 (2019) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties ITO Vs. Vokkaligara …
Jewellery Bills found during search-benefit of CBDT Instruction can not be denied if only bills are found and the jewellery is not available ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2778 (2019) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT V Rtanlal Vyaparilal Jain 339 ITR 351 …
Interest free Advances by charitable society-ITAT rules out violation of provisions of Section 13(1)(c) and 13(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2777 (2019) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Tribunal in DCIT (Exemptions) v. Vels Institute of …
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for addition on account of closing stock valuation by adopting a different method when there is no change in method of valuation ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2775 (2019) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties M/s Janta Construction Co. vs. …
When details are maintained donations cannot be called anonymous u/s 115BBC merely for notices u/s 133(6) returned unserved ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2772 (2019) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties DIT (Exemptions) vs. Keshav Social & Charitable Trust M/s. Vaishnavi Educational Society Versus …
Order giving effect to appellate order is also appealable u/s 246A of the Income Tax Act. If appeals allowed on the legal ground, additions on merits cannot be sustained ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2771 (2019) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT Vs. …
Merely because share prices rose abnormally or other persons involved bogus transactions, Long Term Capital Gain exemption u/s 10(38) can not be denied – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2769 (2019) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Jankinath Sarangi Vs State of Orissa …
Non mentioning reasons recorded for reopening in the assessment order proved that assessment was framed in haste without providing adequate opportunity – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2768 (2019) (02) ITAT The appellant assessee had sought to set aside the impugned order passed by CIT(A) confirming the …
When assessee not maintained books of account and filed under presumptive section, cash deposit in bank were correlated to the turnover – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2767 (2019) (02) ITAT The appellant assessee had sought to set aside the impugned order passed by CIT (Appeals) in holding …
When assessment was framed u/s 144 rejection of application by CIT(A) under Rule 46A to lead additional evidence was unjustified – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2766 (2019) (02) ITAT The appellant assessee had sought to set aside the impugned order passed by CIT (Appeals), The Assessing …
