Category: ITAT
Doubtful advances written off treated as provisions not allowable expenditure u/s 37(1) in contrast to bad debts w/o u/s 36(i)(vii) qua sundry debtor – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1281 (2017) (06) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by the Commissioner …
Mere third party statement of accommodation entries not sufficient to reopen assessment in the absence of any nexus of statement to alleged share applicants-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1279 (2017) (06) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by the Commissioner of …
Appeal before CIT rejected for not filed electronically remanded. Sufficient time to be given to assessee to remove defect by filing e Form-35 – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1278 (2017) (06) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by the Commissioner …
No Addition for upto 10 percent difference in DVOs report and the amount of investment shown by the assessee which is liable to be ignored – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1277 (2017) (06) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by …
Time Limit for assessment-When ITAT simply restored matter to AO for fresh adjudication without any finding or direction, section 153(2A) was applicable and the order was subject to time limitation prescribed. Time Limit for assessment completion u/s 153 ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1276 (2017) (06) ITAT The …
Only real income can be taxed under Income Tax Act. Even if whole transaction is not verifiable only income component not the entire purchase taxable ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1275 (2017) (05) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by the Commissioner …
When substantial question of law admitted by High Court, it is apparent that addition is debatable – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1274 (2017) (06) ITAT Assessment Year : 1999-2000 Date/Month of Pronouncement: May, 2017 Important Case Laws Cited relied upon: Rupam Mercantile vs. DCIT (2004) 91 …
Personal jewellery of family members found during survey in physical stock was to be excluded during assessment as the burden was on AO to controvert the statement – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1273 (2017) (06) ITAT The Grievance: The appeal of the assessee was …
Addition for liability existing in balance sheet u/s 41(1). CIT(A) had no locus standi to enhance the assessment for the reason of cessation of liability – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1272 (2017) (06) ITAT The Grievance: The appeal of the assessee was directed against the order …
CA acting as middleman arranging accommodation entries of share capital-premium through fictitious companies. Commission income estimated @ 1% upheld ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1271 (2017) (06) ITAT The Grievance: The appeal of the assessee was directed against the order passed by CIT(A) confirming the addition, on estimation …
