Category: ITAT

Input VAT credit reversal deduction to be allowed on payment basis u/s 43B irrespective of separate VAT account INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA I.T.A. No. 1047/KOL/ 2015 Assessment Year: 2009-2010 BDG Metal and Power Limited … Appellant vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax… Respondent Date of Order: …

AO if not satisfied must compute FMV 56(2)(viia) Rule 115UA himself. Where a method has been prescribed by the legislature, that method alone shall be followed for computation of the fair market value INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES “A” : HYDERABAD ITA.No.871/Hyd/2015 Assessment Year 2011-2012 M/s. Medplus …

Interest on Fixed Deposit given as Bank Guarantee pre-requisite condition to pollution Board is capital receipt as business activities not commenced INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘‘A’ SMC, NEW DELHI I.T.A .No.-6257/DEL/2015 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2012-13) NV International Pvt. Ltd. (APPELLANT)  vs. ITO (RESPONDENT) Date of Order: 08-03-2016 ORDER PER SUCHITRA …

Addition cannot be made on the basis of the statement recorded during survey under section 133A INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “C”, NEW DELHI I.T.A. No. 6509/DEL/2014 A.Y. 2010-11 M/S IIBS INFONET (P) LTD (APPELLANT)  vs. ACIT (RESPONDENT) Date of Order: 08/03/2016 ORDER PER H.S. SIDHU : JM This appeal by …

Penalty-271(1)(c) – share application money received from different companies with common addresses The Explanation 1 to section 271(1)(c) raises rebuttable presumption and once the assessee has furnished all the evidences in support of its explanation and has substantiated his claim then the onus cost upon him is discharged and …

Penalty-2711c not imposable if income estimated u/s 144 where books of accounts not produced INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR ITA No.293(Asr)/2013 Assessment year: 2005-06 Income Tax Officer (Appellant)  vs. M/s. Age Construction Pvt. Ltd. (Respondent) Date of Order: 04-03/2016 ORDER PER A.D. JAIN, JM: This is the Department’s …

Penalty 271(1)(c) – Limitation provisions u/s 275(1A) apply as per law in force at the time of filing of return INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR I.T.A No.137(Asr)/2014 Assessment Year: 1994-95 Income Tax Officer (Appellant) vs. K.D. Bali (Respondent) Date of Order: 04-03-2016 ORDER PER T. S. KAPOOR (AM): This …

Order passed by CIT-Appeals without waiting for Remand Report called from AO quashed INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR I.T.A No. 442(Asr)/2013 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Iqbal Singh (Appellant) vs. Income Tax Officer (Respondent) Date of Order: 04-03-2016 ORDER PER T. S. KAPOOR (AM): This is an appeal filed by the …

TDS default Proceedings u/s 201/201A can not be initiated unless it is found that deductee has also failed to pay tax directly INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘A’ : NEW DELHI) ITA Nos.5992, 5993 & 5994/Del./2012 (ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2002-03, 2003-04 & 2004-05) The Branch Manager, vs. …

Addition for Unexplained Investment u/s 69 quashed as Muslims religion bars Interest income therefore cash was kept at home INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW ITA No.697/LKW/2015 Assessment year:2010-11 Mehrun Nisha (Appellant) vs. Income Tax Officer (Respondent) Date of Order: 04-03-2016 ORDER PER A. K. GARODIA, A.M. This is …