Category: ITAT
Chapter VI-A deduction allowable on disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) for profits of the eligible business so enhanced by the disallowance- ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2457 (2018) 08 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee challenging the order passed by CIT(A) confirming inter alia disallowance u/s …
CIT can not substitute his view over the view taken by AO in the revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 as AO took one of the possible view ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2454 (2018) 08 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against CIT in invoking the …
AO cannot remain quiet after issuing summons u/s 131 which went unanswered. Without resorting to further investigation no adverse inference could be drawn. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2453 (2018) 08 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the order passed by CIT(A) in upholding …
Addition confirmed for non filing of affidavit stating that the assessee had not agreed for the addition during the assessment proceedings as stated in assessment order ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2452 (2018) 08 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the order passed by …
Commission paid to represent assessee before govt agencies for getting work held not an offence u/s 37(1) – ITAT Judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2447 (2018) 08 ITAT The instant appeal by the assessee was directed against the order of CIT(Appeals) in confirming inter alia the disallowance …
Non issuance of statutory notice u/s 274(1) vitiated levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(b). Mere proposal to initiate penalty proceedings not amount to recording the satisfaction-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2446 (2018) 08 ITAT The instant judgment was delivered in a bunch of appeals filed by several assessee …
Relief under the 89 of the Act is available qua a perquisite. Rule 21A and Form 10E do relate to the contribution in question – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2445 (2018) 07 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the CIT(A)’s action of …
Penalty 271(1)(c) deleted on debatable issue of revenue or capital receipt of the freight subsidy not accounted for on mercantile basis. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2442 (2018) 07 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the …
The right to appeal has been provided in statute u/s 249 which can only be taken away by legislative amendment and not by CBDT in a delegated manner – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2441 (2018) 07 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against …
Addition for undisclosed purchases based on diary of supplier deleted as no addition was made for unaccounted sales in the hand of supplier surveyed ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2440 (2018) 07 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the order passed by the CIT(A) …
