Category: ITAT

Recording two separate reasons for reopening u/s 147 148 bad as it itself shows non-application of mind and assumption of wrong jurisdiction – ITAT

Recording two separate reasons for reopening u/s 147 148 bad as it itself shows non-application of mind and assumption of wrong jurisdiction – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1014 (2016) (09) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case: In the instant case, the assessee was aggrieved by the order …

Commissioner can allow fresh deduction claim u/s 264 under revision petition without requirement of filing of revised income tax return – Kerala High Court

Commissioner can allow fresh deduction claim u/s 264 under revision petition without requirement of filing of revised income tax return – Kerala High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1012 (2016) (09) HC Important Judgments Cited: Parekh Brothers v. Commissioner of Income Tax Goetze (India} Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax …

Fall in GP ratio or non-incurring basic business expenditure like travelling, telephone salary etc. not reasons for rejecting books of accounts us 145

The marginal fall in GP ratio compared to preceding year and non-incurring of expenditure like travelling, telephone, salary, etc. are not the relevant reasons for rejecting of books of accounts under section 145 of the Income Tax Act – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1010 2016 (09) ITAT …

Higher GP rate adoption for mere fall in rate from preceding year. It cannot be a sole reason for choosing higher rate as per Assessing Officers convenience

Higher GP rate adoption for mere fall in rate from preceding year. It cannot be a sole reason for choosing higher rate as per Assessing Officers convenience – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1002 2016 (08) ITAT Assessment Year: 2010-11 Date/Month of Judgment: July 2016 Brief Facts of the …

Additions u/s 28(iv) not apply to benefits received in cash-money. ITAT quashed additions made alleging customers advances opening balances as bogus

Additions u/s 28(iv) not apply to benefits received in cash-money. ITAT quashed additions made by Assessing Officer alleging opening balances of customers advances as bogus. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1000 2016 (08) ITAT The Prelude: It has bee widely held in numerous judgments that additions u/s 68 can not …