Category: ITAT
CBDT Circular though meant for non-seizure of jewellery takes into account quantity of jewellery generally held by family members of a Hindu Family ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3482 (2021) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the …
Addition made for difference due to wrong journal entry. Assessee directed to file reconciliation to explain the difference-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3477 (2021) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the addition made by the Assessing …
Addition made during survey for difference construction expenses between tally accounting package and manual register deleted by ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3477 (2021) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition made on the basis of …
Not passing separate order u/s 161 but adding income of non-resident in hands of assessee as representative assessee bad in law. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3476 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:CIT vs Dr Laxmichand Narpal Nagda (1995) 211 ITR 804 (Bom)Smt Shashi Varma vs CIT …
Surrender of income due to recovery of documents during survey can not be said to be voluntarily. ITAT upheld penalty u/s 271(1)(c) ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3472 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:MAK Data (P) Ltd. v. CIT (2013) 358 ITR 593(SC)Samson Maritime Ltd. 88 taxmann.com …
Earlier cash withdrawal can be explained as source for subsequent bank deposit of cash, provided there are no evidence to show that those withdrawals could not be available to as a source for subsequent deposits. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3471 (2021) (03) ITAT In the instant case, the …
ITAT remanded invocation of Section 115BBE denying set off of current year loss against income assessed u/s 68. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3470 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Sumati Dayal v. CIT reported in (1995) 214 ITR 801(SC)CIT v. Durga Prasad More (1971) 82 ITR 540 …
Addition for cash deposit remanded as bank account was opened by someone else by forging PAN Card and signature of assessee. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3469 (2021) (03) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the addition made …
No TDS u/s 194IA on advance security deposit under JDA as there was no transfer as conditions of Section 2(47)(v) of the Act was not complied ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3468 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Keshub Mahindra v. CGT 70 ITR 1CGT v Smt C …
Addition u/s 68 for cash deposited in bank during demonetization period deleted as cash was deposited by trade debtors ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3465 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Malpani House of Stones Vs CIT (88 taxmaann.com 546) (Raj HC)CIT vs Aggarwal Engg Co. (302 ITR …