Category: ITAT
ALP determined in good faith and with due diligence by assessee was not liable to penalty u/s 271(1)(c) ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3310 (2020) (05) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Dharmendra Textile Processors 295 ITR 244Zoom Communication Pvt. Ltd. 327 ITR 510MAK Data Pvt. Ltd. …
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) merely due to quantum addition without making fresh verification during penalty proceedings ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3299 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:National Textiles Vs. CIT 249 ITR 125. The issue involved in this case was related to penalty …
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on cancellation of automatic deduction u/s 24(a) on wrong classification of income under house property than other sources ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3298 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Reliance Petroproducts (P) Ltd. 322 ITR 158CIT vs. Sambhav …
Expenses incurred during lull business period can not be denied to assessee when he was not able to generate any income. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3297 (2020) (04) ITAT In this case appeals had been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the separate orders of the …
Trust set up for providing benefits to a particular community no ground to deny Section 12AA registration ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3295 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Leuva Patel Seva Samaj TrustM/s Ananda Social & Educational Trust In this case, the appellant assessee …
Withdrawal of deduction u/s 54/54F beyond scope of rectification u/s 154. AO has no jurisdiction to re-appreciate evidences already considered. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3294 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:T.S. Balaram, Income Tax Officer vs Volkart Brothers & Ors, 82 ITR 50 …
Exemption u/s 54/54F for house purchased in wife name, Deduction allowed for change in jurisdictional High Court with favourable judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3292 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT, Faridabad vs Dinesh VermaCIT vs., Kamal Wahal 351 ITR4CIT vs. Ravinder Kumar …
Tax paid in foreign country not eligible for benefit u/s 91 is expenditure eligible for deduction under section 37(1) of the Act – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3289 (2020) (03) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Reliance Infrastructure Ltd versus CIT 390 ITR 271Hindustan Construction …
Trader in scrap not liable to collect TCS u/s 206C if scrap not a result of manufacturing ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3284 (2020) (03) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Navine Fluorine International Ltd. vs. ACIT (TDS)Nathulal P. Lavti vs. ITO(TDS)M/s Bharti Auto Products vs. CITDhasawala …
Penalty notice u/s 271AAB without specifying at what percentage the penalty will be levied makes it defective and invalid and deserved to be quashed-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3274 (2020) (02) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:DCIT v/s R. ElangovanRavi Mathur vs. DCITPr. CIT vs. …
