Category: ITAT
Fair Market Value of property as on 01.04.1981-ITAT follows Supreme Court Guidelines and adopts value as suggested by both Revenue and the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 266 (2018) (12) ITAT The appellant assessee was an individual. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny under …
Set off of expenses against surrendered income held erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue as assessee failed to demonstrate that income surrendered had a business link. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2664 (2018) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: M/s. Makson Distributors, Vs. The …
No revision u/s 263 without pointing out how assessment order is erroneous. Order quashed as CIT did not mention whether assessee’s contentions were acceptable or not. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2662 (2018) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Narayan Tatu Rane vs. ITO reported in (2016) …
Deduction u/s 54F denied for non deposit in capital gains accounts scheme allowed as investment in flat purchase was made before due date u/s 139(4) ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2660 (2018) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Xavier J Pulickal vs. DCIT 379 ITR 534 Sunayana …
Appeal filed without paying tax due on returned income is only defective not void. On payment of taxes even after disposal, the appeal revives – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2658 (2018) (11) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Bhumiraj Constructions Vs. ACIT M.L. Srinivasa Setty & …
Assumed Service of notice when it not received back not accepted by ITAT as proof of service on the assessee. Order of CIT(A) remanded holding that assessee was prevented by reasonable and sufficient cause for not appearing ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2657 (2018) (12) ITAT The appeal …
Capital gain addition u/s 50C for unauthenticated cuttings in sale deed for amount of sale consideration remanded back for obtaining copy from the Registering authority ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2655 (2018) (11) ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner …
Disallowance of 80IB deduction by passing rectification order u/s 154 quashed as AO took a conscious and considered view to allow deduction which was not mistake apparent – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2654 (2018) (11) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT vs. Krishak Bharti Co-operative …
Disallowance u/s 40A(2)(b) merely for common Directors not sustainable. Invoking the section necessarily implies that such expenses are otherwise allowable – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2653 (2018) (11) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT vs. Enviro Control Associate Pvt. Ltd. 43 taxman.com 291 The appellant …
Peak of both debit and credit entries of seized papers only can be added as undisclosed income, no justification for adding only receipt side of seized papers ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2651 (2018) (11) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Tirupati Construction Company 55 taxmann.com 308 (2015 …