Category: Judgments
Disallowance of ITC under UP VAT Act 2008 not same as in Karnataka VAT Act with respect to by-product/exempt goods – Supreme Court allows ITC ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3813 (2023) (11) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:State of Karnataka v. M.K. Agro Tech Private Limited, …
Non-issuance of the notice u/s 154(3) is a procedural irregularity. ITAT directs AO to issue notice and give opportunity ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3812 (2023) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Chockalingam & Meyyappan Vs. CIT (1963) 48 ITR 34 In the instant case, the assessee …
Before disallowance of salary u/s 40A(2)(b) Assessing Officer was duty bound to provide an opportunity to the assessee to place on record the requisite evidence. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3811 (2023) (10) HC In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the ITAT in …
No revision u/s 263 can be done on debatable Issue on applicability of provision of Section 115BBE of the Act to the relevant assessment year – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3810 (2023) (10) (ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Balvinder Singh vs. PCITYogesh Kumar vs. PCIT …
In revision proceedings CIT cannot travel beyond the reasons given in the show-cause notice u/s 263 – Supreme Court dismisses SLP of the Department ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3809 (2023) (09) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:CIT vs. Amitabh Bachchan (384 ITR 200) (2016) In the …
No penalty u/s 271F as due to mistake of DDO wrong PAN was mentioned in 26AS and assessee was precluded from filing the return of income – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3808 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by …
Benefit of concessional rate of tax u/s 115BAA can not be denied on the premise that assessee has to file Form No. 10IC for each assessment year ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3807 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the …
Depositing unutilized capital gain amount in a special account is only a procedural matter, and non-compliance thereof cannot result in disallowance of deduction u/s 54 – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3806 (2023) (09) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:CIT vs Venkata Dilip Kumar (277 taxman …
Assessing Officer was wrong to put the onus on assessee to prove that alleged cash transaction did not taken place – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3805 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the Income Tax Officer has challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in deleting …
Reasons on which reopening done must first survive to make addition on additional issues also – ITAT explains Explanation 3 to section 147 ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3804 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) and raised the …
