Category: Judgments
Exercise of power by CIT u/s 263 is barred when appeal u/s 250 is pending. “record” means what is available at the time of examination by CIT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3131 (2019) (08) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. vs. Commissioner …
Failure of AO to issue summons u/s 131(1) on request of assessee in order to enable him to discharge his prima facie onus is fatal to the assessment proceedings ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3130 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties: (a) Sona Electric …
Non response to unauthorised enquiry letter issued without approval not constitute material forming belief of escapement of income u/s 147 ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3129 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Parsuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd. vs. ITO 106 ITR 1. (SC) Amrik Singh …
Affixture of income tax notice-essential conditions, procedure and law explained by ITAT. Unless notice is served on proper person in manner prescribed, service is insufficient and invalidates the jurisdiction of AO ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3128 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Vankat Naicken …
Revision 263 merely for difference in income as per P&L Account & TDS statement quashed as assessment order was not erroneous & prejudicial to Revenue ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3127 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd-vs-CIT (2000) 243 ITR 83 …
Reasons recorded must withstand test of judicial scrutiny at any stage. Other materials can not be used to test application of mind. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3126 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO (2002) 125 Taxman 963(S.C)M/s GinniFilaments …
Reopening done at the insistence of CIT held as change of opinion and was vitiated in law as it did not satisfy the legal requirement of Section 147 of the Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3124 (2019) (08) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Larsen and …
Revision u/s 263 merely on ground of non-discussion / non-mentioning of reply to queries in assessment proceeding/order is invalid ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3123 (2019) (08) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Malabar Industrial Company vs. CIT (2000) 109 taxman 66 (SC)CIT vs. Krishan Capbox Ltd. …
Incriminating documents belonging to or containing information pertaining to assessee. The High Court explains the amendment made in section 153C ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3122 (2019) (08) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties: Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (2014) 367 …
Proceedings initiated u/s 148 instead of section 153C quashed. ITAT explains the difference between jurisdiction under both sections ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3121 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:National Thermal Power Co. Ltd., Vs. CIT (SC).Smt.Archana Pandey Vs. ITO (2013) F G. Koteshwara …