Category: Judgments
Simply because the overseas employer paid salary into NRE account of the assessee in India, would by itself, not imply that the income is taxable in India In a recent judgment ITAT has held that only because the overseas employer paid salary into NRE account of the assessee …
Intimation issued u/s 143(1) after issue of notice u/s 143(2) legally invalid. Intimation u/s 143(1)(a) can not be issued after notice for regular assessment has been issued under section 143(2) ITAT in a recent judgment has confirmed that Intimation issued u/s 143(1) after issue of notice u/s 143(2) …
Compensation to owner of flats for delay in handing over possession to be treated as a part of work-in-progress – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3771 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in National Faceless Appeal Centre …
ITD says mentioning correct contact & email id details in efiling portal is assessee’s mandatory duty. Ignorance of law and process not to be encouraged ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3770 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee was aggrieved by the ex-parte orders of first appellate …
When examining details, CIT(Appeals) was not clear as to nature then expenses cannot be disallowed by CPC under artificial intelligence – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3769 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the The National Faceless Appeal Centre …
Penalty u/s 271B deleted where accountant handling accounts suddenly left the job but assessee furnished audit report before completion of assessment. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3768 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the The National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC)/ …
Addition for unexplained cash deleted as assessee consistently declared tuition income and paid tax over 20 -25 years ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3767 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition made by the Assessing Officer …
Merely because assessee did not filed appeal against addition it cannot be a ground for imposing penalty – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3766 (2023) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Rajiv Kumar Garg vs. ITOCIT vs. Aero Traders (P) Ltd.Harigopal Singh vs. CIT (2002) 258 ITR 85 …
Estimating higher gross profit rate without rejecting books of account or pointing out any defects or discrepancies in the audited books of accounts not permissible ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3765 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the Revenue had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in …
Maintenance charge income received from tenants held income from business or profession not income from house property. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3764 (2023) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:M/s. Kirloskar Systems Ltd. vs. ACITCIT vs. Model Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd. (1986) 159 ITR 270CIT vs. Kanak Investments …
