Category: Judgments
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for addition on account of closing stock valuation by adopting a different method when there is no change in method of valuation ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2775 (2019) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties M/s Janta Construction Co. vs. …
Directors receiving remuneration also employee u/s 2(9) of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2774 (2019) (02) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Employees’ State Insurance Corporation Vs. Apex Engineering Pvt. Ltd. ; Sakal Papers Private Limited …
Sales Tax liability on free replacement of defective parts in motor vehicles during warranty period. Matter to be decided by Larger Bench of SC ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2773 (2019) (02) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Mohd. Ekram Khan & Sons v. Commissioner …
When details are maintained donations cannot be called anonymous u/s 115BBC merely for notices u/s 133(6) returned unserved ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2772 (2019) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties DIT (Exemptions) vs. Keshav Social & Charitable Trust M/s. Vaishnavi Educational Society Versus …
Order giving effect to appellate order is also appealable u/s 246A of the Income Tax Act. If appeals allowed on the legal ground, additions on merits cannot be sustained ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2771 (2019) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT Vs. …
Condonation of delay u/s 119(2)(b) for mistake of chartered accountant allowed. limitation when lead to hardships, should be construed in a reasonable manner-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2770 (2019) (02) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT versus Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers Pvt. …
Merely because share prices rose abnormally or other persons involved bogus transactions, Long Term Capital Gain exemption u/s 10(38) can not be denied – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2769 (2019) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Jankinath Sarangi Vs State of Orissa …
Non mentioning reasons recorded for reopening in the assessment order proved that assessment was framed in haste without providing adequate opportunity – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2768 (2019) (02) ITAT The appellant assessee had sought to set aside the impugned order passed by CIT(A) confirming the …
When assessee not maintained books of account and filed under presumptive section, cash deposit in bank were correlated to the turnover – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2767 (2019) (02) ITAT The appellant assessee had sought to set aside the impugned order passed by CIT (Appeals) in holding …
When assessment was framed u/s 144 rejection of application by CIT(A) under Rule 46A to lead additional evidence was unjustified – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2766 (2019) (02) ITAT The appellant assessee had sought to set aside the impugned order passed by CIT (Appeals), The Assessing …