Category: Judgments
When appeal is pending before CIT(A), revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 can not be exercised – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3612 (2022) (09) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties Smt. Renuka Philip vs. ITO 409 ITR 567 (Mad)CIT vs. Vam Resorts and Hotels Pvt. Ltd. 418 …
Income Tax appeals cannot be proceeded with during the continuance of the proceedings under IBC ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3611 (2022) (09) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons vs Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction (2021) 126 taxmann.com 132 (SC)Mahavir Roads & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., …
Definition of secured creditor in IBC does not exclude Government or Governmental Authority – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3610 (2022) (09) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by parties Swiss Ribbons (P) Ltd. v. Union of IndiaVishal Saxena & Anr. vs. Swami Deen Gupta Resolution ProfessionalAssistant …
A general statement that escapement of income is due to failure of assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment is not enough and is change of opinion. Hon’ble Supreme Court dismisses SLP of Department ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3609 (2022) (08) SC …
Which is Jurisdictional High Court upon transfer of case u/s 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 from one AO to another Assessing Officer located in a different State – Supreme Court settles the issue ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3608 (2022) (08) SC Important Case Laws involved:Seth Banarsi …
Tendering Process was not vitiated by quoting wrong GST rates/HSN Code by Suppliers – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3607 (2022) (08) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by partiesReliance Energy Ltd. 2007) 8 SCC 1Sarvesh Refractories (P) Ltd. (2007)13 SCC 601Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd (2012) 5 …
No service tax levy on Composite Works Contracts prior to the introduction of the Finance Act 2007 – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 3606 (2022) (08) ICAI Important Case Laws involvedG. D. Builders Vs. Union of India, (2013) 32 STR 673 (Delhi)Commissioner, Central Excise and Customs, …
Once dispute settled and complainant not interested in pursuing case, ICAI was not justified holding CA guilty of professional misconduct – Supreme Court dismisses SLP of ICAI ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 3605 (2022) (08) ICAI A complaint was filed before ICAI by a Chartered Accountant against another …
Deduction u/s 54. Assessee cannot be blamed for the delay in housing projects by the builder as sections 54 and 54F are beneficial provisions. In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that deduction u/s 54 can not be denied for the delay in housing projects by the builder …
Higher consumption of electricity by itself is not a ground to infer suppression of production by the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 3603 (2022) (06) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Prinik Steels Private LimitedITO vs. Satyanarayan PareekCIT vs. Gajalaxmi Steel Pvt. Ltd.CIT vs. Khambhatta Family Trust In …
