Category: Judgments
The assessee entitled to claim deduction u/s 80HH with respect for profits derived from processing of cashew in the factories owned by outsiders – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2234 (2018) (03) HC The respondent assessee had been carrying on processing of cashew nuts in owned …
ITAT rejected cash flow statement for no household drawings made. Addition u/s 68 sustained for estimated amount of household drawings ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2233 (2018) (03) ITAT The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) sustaining the addition made …
Section 50C not applicable to cold storage building so to substitute actual sale consideration by deemed sale consideration and order of AO cannot be revised u/s 263 – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2232 (2018) (03) ITAT The assessee was aggrieved by the order passed under section …
Disallowance u/s 40A(3) for cash payment to BSNL deleted as BSNL is a State and payments were made for business expediency and were not doubted – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2231 (2018) (03) ITAT Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) puts an …
Concealment penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted on humanitarian grounds as the assessee had died, his business was closed and his widow was depositing the quantum demand-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2230 (2018) (03) ITAT The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A) in confirming the …
No scope for imposing penalty u/s 271A in the case of Civil Contractor which is covered u/s 44AA(2) and is not carrying on any specified profession – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2229 (2018) (03) ITAT Prelude: Section 44AA if the Income Tax Act, 1961 provides for …
TDS on testing and commissioning services deductible u/s 194C as contractual payments as not as fees for technical services u/s 194J-ITAT follows High Court decision ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2228 (2018) (03) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Pr. CIT Vs. Bharat Heavy Electricals …
Section 55A related to DVO reference not apply in a reverse case when value claimed by assessee exceeds the fair market value as determined by the AO-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2227 (2018) (02) HC The appellant assessee had filed an appeal under Section 260-A of …
Exclusion of genetic disorders in insurance contracts is illegal and unconstitutional. IRDA directed to ensure that insurance companies do not reject such claims-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2226 (2018) (02) HC The Respondent/Plaintiff (“Plaintiff‟) had taken a medi-claim insurance policy for himself along with his wife …
CA alleged as master mind of issuing bogus bills gets relief from Appellate Authority. ICAI had held Mumbai based CA guilty of Other misconduct on the complaint of Income Tax Authorities ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2225 (2018) (02) CA-AA The appellant Chartered Accountant (CA) had challenged the …