Category: Judgments
Income Tax Rule 8D is prospective in operation and could not apply to any assessment year prior to AY 2008-09 – Supreme Court settles the law ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2188 (2018) (01) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Meerut Vs. Sharvan Kumar Swarup & Sons, …
Powers u/s 154 available for rectifying interest u/s 220 or 244 for miscalculation of interest which is, at best arithmetical error needing no elaborate or long drawn adjudication-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2187 (2018) (01) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Hindustan Lever …
Creditors not barred by limitation if liability acknowledged in accounts, creditors can rely on the said acknowledgment-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2185 (2018) (01) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The assessee, during the course of the assessment proceedings had furnished details of the creditors. …
The High Court explains the law on levy of interest u/s 234B(3) when reassessment is done determing escaped income after issue of refund. Prelude: Section 234B(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) provides for levy of interest where a reassessment or re-computation under Section 147 or …
Exempted income can not be taxed even if no revised return filed. AO in proceedings u/s 143 can not refuse to grant relief on such technical plea – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2183 (2018) (01) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Goetze …
Business expediency not a question of law, much less a substantial question of law-High Court. If expected fruits are not reaped from a business proposition, it is no basis to challenge the business expediency. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2182 (2018) (01) HC The Challenge/Grievance: The instant appeal …
While considering the question of perversity of a finding of fact, the test applicable are strict-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2181 (2018) (01) HC The appellant Revenue had filed the instant appeal challenging that findings recorded by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) were perverse and …
Addition on account of milling gain on adhoc basis without conducting any enquiry, without any cogent and specific reason or without any material on record deleted-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2180 (2018) (01) ITAT The Challenge/Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A) …
High Court directs reopening of GST Portal for filing TRAN-1 of the Petitioner as the Portal did not respond on the last date resulting loss of ITC to the trader. The non response by the GST Common Portal on the last date for filing various online Forms due …
At the stage of admission, Settlement Commission not expected or be compelled to utilizing the machinery available to call records invoking Rule 9 or Section 245D(3). The petitioner should satisfy the Settlement Commission that there has been full and true disclosure ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2178 (2018) …