Category: Judgments
Addition deleted for contingent liability stated in tax audit report but which was not debited to the P&L Account In a recent judgment, ITAT Kolkata upheld the order of CIT(A) deleting the addition made by CPC for contingent liability stated in tax audit report but which was not …
Mere failure of partner to respond to notice u/s 133(6) does not ipso facto establish that the capital is unexplained – ITAT upheld deletion of addition u/s 68 In recent case, ITAT Ahmedabad has upheld that the failure of the partner to respond to a notice under section …
Why cannot be the date of submission of reply and the date of personal hearing be the same, we are not aware of any such law – Allahabad High Court In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has dismissed the Petition of the assessee against the GST …
Even if no response is filed by assessee to notices u/s 61 and 73 of GST Act, it was incumbent on the Department to pass an order in compliance of provisions of Section 75(6) of the Act In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Allahabad High Court quashed order passed …
Assessee did not challenge order u/s 148A(d) and participated in the re-assessment proceedings – High Court declined to interfere In a recent judgment, Rajasthan High Court declined to interfere with re-assessment proceedings as the assessee did not challenge the order under section 148A(d) and participated in the re-assessment …
High Court condoned delay in filing Audit Report in Form 10B as the change in dates in filing audit report before return had caused confusion. In a recent judgment, Kerala High Court condoned the delay in filing Audit Report in Form 10B as the change in dates in …
Addition u/s 68 for corpus donation received from struck off companies – SLP dismissed In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition (SLP) of the assessee against the order of the High Court upholding addition under section 68 towards corpus donation received from companies …
Merely because deductor under misconception deducted TDS u/s 194C and 194J, it would not disentitle assessee, benefit under Sections 11 and 12 of the Act. In a recent judgment, The Hon’ble Supreme Court has dismissed the SLP of the Revenue against the the decision of the Delhi High …
Reopening quashed as AO failed to provide all information and relied upon material available alongwith notice u/s 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi quashed notice under section 148 as Assessing Officer failed to comply with the direction given by …
Cash withdrawn from the bank account cannot be considered as unexplained money when the turnover was not disputed – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Jaipur deleted addition under section 69A holding that cash withdrawn from the bank account cannot be considered as unexplained money when the turnover …
