Category: Supreme Court
Stock Appreciation Rights received prior to 01.04.2000 not perquisite u/s 17(2)(iiia) such provisions being not retrospective-Supreme Court The Revenue had filed the instant appeal against the judgment of the High Court in upholding that the amount received on redemption of Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) was to be …
Interest earned on share application money kept in fixed deposit was liable to be set off against the public issue expenses-Supreme Court The question for consideration was whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, interest accrued on account of deposit of share application money was taxable …
Satisfaction u/s 158BD can not be arrived without examination, verification of seized books documents. SC uphelds validity of notice issued by AO The appellant assessee had filed the instant appeal against the impugned judgment passed by the High Court by which it dismissed the appeal of the appellant …
Supplying blue prints can be considered as technical services u/s 80-O but deduction rightly denied as they were not produced before lower authorities-Supreme Court The instant appeal had been filed against the judgment passed by the High Court of Delhi whereby the Division Bench dismissed the appeal filed …
Reassessment on change of opinion on the same facts and circumstances already in AO’s knowledge during the original assessment proceedings invalid-SC ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2301 (2018) (04) SC The appellant Revenue had filed the instant appeal against the judgment of Delhi High Court quashing the notice …
Conflict of interest is sufficient cause for share transfer refusal u/s 58(4) of Companies Act, 2013 –Supreme Court. CLB obliged consider contention of transfer being deceptive and mala fide. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2265 (2018) (03) SC The appellant was a public company whose majority of shares …
Supreme Court explains the doctrine of mutuality. In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court has explained the doctrine of mutuality. Receipts of non-occupancy charges, transfer charges, common amenity fund charges received by cooperative societies, from its members exempt from tax ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2260 (2018) (03) …
The Legislature cannot overturn a judgment by way of introducing an amendment to make the judgment wrong or a nullity-Supreme Court declares retrospective amendment as illegal ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2253 (2018) (03) SC The Karnataka Money Lenders Act, 1961 (M.L. Act) regulates and control the transactions …
Supreme Court issues direction for implementation of the BOCW Act and Cess Act for the benefit of building and other construction workers. Symbolic justice-there is nothing more to offer to several millions of construction workers in the unorganized sector – not social justice, not economic justice. The reason is …
Foreign law firms/companies or foreign lawyers cannot practice profession of law in India either in the litigation or in nonlitigation side. “fly in and fly out” will only cover a casual visit not amounting to “practice” ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2245 (2018) (03) SC The issue involved …
