Category: Supreme Court
Concurrent running of sentence us 138 Negotiable Instrument Act 1988 in two cheque dishonour complaint cases. Court empowered with discretion u/s 427 of CPC -Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1044 (2016) (10) SC Important Case Law Cited: V.K. Bansal vs. State of Haryana and Another (2013) 7 …
Concessional trade tax rate against Form III-B Penalty leviable u/s 4B(6) not u/s 3B of the U. P. Trade Tax Act for failure to sell the goods within the State, export them or sell them in the course of inter-State trade or commerce-SC ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1043 …
Polished granite slab used on floor is not tile under Karnataka Sales Tax Act Entry 8. that there is a distinction between polished granite stone or slabs and tiles-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1038 (2016) (10) SC Important Case Law Referred: M/s. Vishwakarma Granites v. Commissioner of …
Expenses on issue of shares eligible deduction us 35D. Deduction for payment of bonus to employees eligible u/s 36 and section 43B or 40A(9) does not come into play-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1029 (2016) (10) SC Assessment Year: 2001-02 Questions of Law framed: Whether expenditure incurred on …
Supreme Court stays Delhi HC judgment on Service Tax Audit by Departmental Officer or CAG The Supreme Court has stayed the judgment/decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of Mega Cabs Private Limited. In the said judgment, the Delhi High Court had declared ultra vires and struck down that …
No contempt of Court for direction to do something impossible. The Supreme Court deplores High Court in holding appellant guilty and imposing sentence. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1019 (2016) (09) SC Brief Facts of the Case: In the instant case, the appellant was held guilty of contempt of Court by …
Work assigned to sub-contractors or payments made to them not part of total turnover us 6B of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act 1957 – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1009 2016 (09) SC Important Judgments Cited: State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. v. Larsen & Toubro Limited …
Excise duty refund for trade-turnover discounts not allowable unless duty passed on to the ultimate consumer else it would result in unjust enrichment – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1004 2016 (08) SC Important Judgments cited: Mafatlal Industries Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India And Ors., (1997) …
Allahabad High Court local advocate engagement Rules 3 3A not unconstitutional but valid. They are not ultra vires Section 30 of the Advocates Act 1961 – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 999 2016 (08) SC Important Case Laws/judgments cited: Bar Council of India v. High Court of …
Rent held Business Income not House Property income When the the assessee company had only one business and that is of leasing its property and earning rent therefrom, the income so earned should be treated as its business income and not as income from house property-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case …
